Subjective Technology Risk and Education Preferences: <scp>VET</scp> as a Safe Haven or Dead End?

ABSTRACT Education equips individuals with valuable skills to protect them against employment risks associated with the digital transition. As scholars debate whether vocational education and training (VET) or general education better insures against technology‐induced employment risk, we ask how this type of risk, as perceived by individuals, shapes their education preferences. Our analyses, based on a survey of over 11,500 respondents across seven European countries, show that VET is regarded as a safe haven by those perceiving heightened risk. This relationship remains robust when controlling for various alternative explanations and is consistent across countries. Subgroup interactions indicate that men, high‐income earners, respondents with tertiary education, and those politically on the right more strongly favor VET in response to subjective technology risk. Hence, our study suggests that VET's practical, job‐oriented focus is perceived as better protection against the growing uncertainty over skill demands in the twin transition than general education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70067
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective Technology Risk and Education Preferences: VET as a Safe Haven or Dead End?

Scherwin M. Bajka, Matthias Haslberger
1 citations
Regulation & Governance
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
4.20
article

Subjective Technology Risk and Education Preferences: VET as a Safe Haven or Dead End?

Scherwin M. Bajka, Matthias Haslberger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Education equips individuals with valuable skills to protect them against employment risks associated with the digital transition. As scholars debate whether vocational education and training (VET) or general education better insures against technology‐induced employment risk, we ask how this type of risk, as perceived by individuals, shapes their education preferences. Our analyses, based on a survey of over 11,500 respondents across seven European countries, show that VET is regarded as a safe haven by those perceiving heightened risk. This relationship remains robust when controlling for various alternative explanations and is consistent across countries. Subgroup interactions indicate that men, high‐income earners, respondents with tertiary education, and those politically on the right more strongly favor VET in response to subjective technology risk. Hence, our study suggests that VET's practical, job‐oriented focus is perceived as better protection against the growing uncertainty over skill demands in the twin transition than general education.

Regulation & Governance
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Universität St. Gallen, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subjective Technology Risk and Education Preferences: <scp>VET</scp> as a Safe Haven or Dead End? — Scherwin M. Bajka, Matthias Haslberger · Regulation & Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS