Ensuring robustness in scientific research, split-root assays as an example case

Scientific progress relies on reproducibility, replicability, and robustness of research outcomes. After briefly discussing these terms and their significance for reliable scientific discovery, we argue for the importance of investigating robustness of outcomes to experimental protocol variations. We highlight challenges in achieving robust, replicable results in multi-step plant science experiments, using split-root assays in Arabidopsis thaliana as a case study. These experiments are important for unraveling the contributions of local, systemic and long-distance signalling in plant responses and play a central role in nutrient foraging research. The complexity of these experiments allows for extensive variation in protocols. We investigate what variations do or do not result in similar outcomes and provide concrete recommendations for enhancing the replicability and robustness of these and other complex experiments by extending the level of detail in research protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantitative Plant Biology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2025.10004
Primary Topic
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring robustness in scientific research, split-root assays as an example case

Kirsten ten Tusscher, Kaisa Kajala, Ronald Pierik, L. Salvatore
Quantitative Plant Biology
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
article

Ensuring robustness in scientific research, split-root assays as an example case

Kirsten ten Tusscher, Kaisa Kajala, Ronald Pierik, L. Salvatore
article en

Abstract

Scientific progress relies on reproducibility, replicability, and robustness of research outcomes. After briefly discussing these terms and their significance for reliable scientific discovery, we argue for the importance of investigating robustness of outcomes to experimental protocol variations. We highlight challenges in achieving robust, replicable results in multi-step plant science experiments, using split-root assays in Arabidopsis thaliana as a case study. These experiments are important for unraveling the contributions of local, systemic and long-distance signalling in plant responses and play a central role in nutrient foraging research. The complexity of these experiments allows for extensive variation in protocols. We investigate what variations do or do not result in similar outcomes and provide concrete recommendations for enhancing the replicability and robustness of these and other complex experiments by extending the level of detail in research protocols.

Quantitative Plant BiologyVol. 6
Utrecht University (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Universiteit Utrecht, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ensuring robustness in scientific research, split-root assays as an example case — Kirsten ten Tusscher, Kaisa Kajala, et al. · Quantitative Plant Biology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS