Deep Learning versus Machine Learning for Music Genre Classification: A Dual-Dataset Evaluation

Music genre classification is a key challenge in Music Information Retrieval (MIR) due to the complex temporal and spectral characteristics of audio signals. This study provides a comparative evaluation of traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms-including Support Vector Machines (SVM), kNearest Neighbors (k-NN), and Logistic Regression-and modern deep learning approaches, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and a hybrid CNN + BiLSTM architecture. Experiments were conducted on the GTZAN and FMA-Small datasets using both raw audio waveforms and Mel spectrograms as input features. The results indicate that deep learning models consistently outperform traditional methods across all evaluation metrics. On the GTZAN dataset, both the CNN and the CNN + BiLSTM architectures achieved an accuracy of 91%, while on the FMA-Small dataset, the CNN + BiLSTM model attained the highest accuracy of 93%. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of deep learning in capturing both spatial and temporal dependencies in audio data and offer practical insights into model selection based on performance, scalability, and data characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isas66241.2025.11101752
Primary Topic
Music and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning versus Machine Learning for Music Genre Classification: A Dual-Dataset Evaluation

Hikmetcan Özcan, Kadir Kesimal, Mehmet Eren Reyhanlıoglu
Music and Audio Processing
article

Deep Learning versus Machine Learning for Music Genre Classification: A Dual-Dataset Evaluation

Hikmetcan Özcan, Kadir Kesimal, Mehmet Eren Reyhanlıoglu
article en

Abstract

Music genre classification is a key challenge in Music Information Retrieval (MIR) due to the complex temporal and spectral characteristics of audio signals. This study provides a comparative evaluation of traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms-including Support Vector Machines (SVM), kNearest Neighbors (k-NN), and Logistic Regression-and modern deep learning approaches, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and a hybrid CNN + BiLSTM architecture. Experiments were conducted on the GTZAN and FMA-Small datasets using both raw audio waveforms and Mel spectrograms as input features. The results indicate that deep learning models consistently outperform traditional methods across all evaluation metrics. On the GTZAN dataset, both the CNN and the CNN + BiLSTM architectures achieved an accuracy of 91%, while on the FMA-Small dataset, the CNN + BiLSTM model attained the highest accuracy of 93%. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of deep learning in capturing both spatial and temporal dependencies in audio data and offer practical insights into model selection based on performance, scalability, and data characteristics.

Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Music and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Deep Learning versus Machine Learning for Music Genre Classification: A Dual-Dataset Evaluation — Hikmetcan Özcan, Kadir Kesimal, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS