The limited role of expectancy-value beliefs, self-efficacy, and perceived attentional control in predicting online learning outcomes in a general education course

Introduction Researchers have expended enormous effort on understanding how college students’ intrapersonal beliefs contribute to their academic success. Methods This study used structural equation modeling to examine factors associated with course outcomes of students enrolled in an online general education course at a non-selective public college (16 sections, N = 940). Results Structural models linked students’ expectancy-value beliefs with academic self-efficacy, which in turn correlated with reading comprehension and self-reported attentional control. Both reading comprehension and self-reported attentional control predicted course outcomes whereas students’ expectancy-value beliefs and academic self-efficacy had no direct influence. Despite adequate model fit, students’ intrapersonal beliefs and skills collectively accounted for only 6.6% of the variance in course outcomes. Conclusions Individual-level variables may lack explanatory value in accounting for online learning outcomes, indicating the need to increase emphasis in educational psychology research on social and systemic factors affecting student success. Instructors should also recognize that factors besides intrapersonal beliefs and skills influence students’ persistence in online coursework and the need to support students at risk of dropping out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1597898
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The limited role of expectancy-value beliefs, self-efficacy, and perceived attentional control in predicting online learning outcomes in a general education course

Patricia Joyce Brooks, S. Elizabeth, Raoul Roberts, C. Donnan Gravelle et al.
Frontiers in Education
Higher Education Research Studies
article

The limited role of expectancy-value beliefs, self-efficacy, and perceived attentional control in predicting online learning outcomes in a general education course

Patricia Joyce Brooks, S. Elizabeth, Raoul Roberts, C. Donnan Gravelle, Arshia K. Lodhi, Nicolas Zapparrata
article en

Abstract

Introduction Researchers have expended enormous effort on understanding how college students’ intrapersonal beliefs contribute to their academic success. Methods This study used structural equation modeling to examine factors associated with course outcomes of students enrolled in an online general education course at a non-selective public college (16 sections, N = 940). Results Structural models linked students’ expectancy-value beliefs with academic self-efficacy, which in turn correlated with reading comprehension and self-reported attentional control. Both reading comprehension and self-reported attentional control predicted course outcomes whereas students’ expectancy-value beliefs and academic self-efficacy had no direct influence. Despite adequate model fit, students’ intrapersonal beliefs and skills collectively accounted for only 6.6% of the variance in course outcomes. Conclusions Individual-level variables may lack explanatory value in accounting for online learning outcomes, indicating the need to increase emphasis in educational psychology research on social and systemic factors affecting student success. Instructors should also recognize that factors besides intrapersonal beliefs and skills influence students’ persistence in online coursework and the need to support students at risk of dropping out.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), College of Staten Island (US), City University of New York (US)
City University of New York, Graduate Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.