Brand Voice Alignment in Chatbots: Comparison of Prompt Engineering and LLM Fine-tuning

This paper examines two primary methodologies for achieving brand voice consistency in AI chatbots: prompt engineering and fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs). As organizations increasingly use chatbots for customer interaction, maintaining a consistent brand voice has become crucial for customer experience and brand identity and brand reputation. We compare the effectiveness, scalability, and implementation challenges of prompt engineering versus LLM fine-tuning approaches in achieving authentic brand voice representation. Through experimental analysis, we evaluate factors such as tone accuracy, response consistency, and implementation complexity. Our findings provide insights into the optimal methodology selection based on organizational needs, resource availability, and desired brand voice complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eit64391.2025.11103650
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brand Voice Alignment in Chatbots: Comparison of Prompt Engineering and LLM Fine-tuning

Saira Afzal, Shantanu Sharma
AI in Service Interactions
article

Brand Voice Alignment in Chatbots: Comparison of Prompt Engineering and LLM Fine-tuning

Saira Afzal, Shantanu Sharma
article en

Abstract

This paper examines two primary methodologies for achieving brand voice consistency in AI chatbots: prompt engineering and fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs). As organizations increasingly use chatbots for customer interaction, maintaining a consistent brand voice has become crucial for customer experience and brand identity and brand reputation. We compare the effectiveness, scalability, and implementation challenges of prompt engineering versus LLM fine-tuning approaches in achieving authentic brand voice representation. Through experimental analysis, we evaluate factors such as tone accuracy, response consistency, and implementation complexity. Our findings provide insights into the optimal methodology selection based on organizational needs, resource availability, and desired brand voice complexity.

Prague Zoo (CZ), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.