Human behavior in cybersecurity: an opportunity for risk research

In cybersecurity, many serious incidents can be traced back to human behavior, either on the attacker’s or victim’s side. Ransomware attacks are a prime example of a highly effective approach relying on an attacker’s deliberate exploitation of a single human error. Despite decades of research on risk perception and behavior, little has been done to transfer existing insights on human factors to secure individuals and organizations in the digital space. Many foundational concepts central to our research community, such as uncertainty, risk compensation, and risk as affect are still underrepresented in the current cybersecurity discourse. Thus, we shed light on concepts that can address today’s challenges to increase cyber resilience, such as the use of heuristics to detect incidents or mental models to enable target group-oriented risk communication. As a starting point, we formulate research questions that aim to transfer risk frameworks and methodologies to cybersecurity to pave the way for new approaches to cyber risk management, better security tools, and effective security policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Risk Research
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2025.2539109
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human behavior in cybersecurity: an opportunity for risk research

Nico Ebert, Benjamin Ambuehl, Noah Bosshart, Thierry Schaltegger et al.
2 citations
Journal of Risk Research
Risk Perception and Management
8.40
article

Human behavior in cybersecurity: an opportunity for risk research

Nico Ebert, Benjamin Ambuehl, Noah Bosshart, Thierry Schaltegger, Angela Bearth
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In cybersecurity, many serious incidents can be traced back to human behavior, either on the attacker’s or victim’s side. Ransomware attacks are a prime example of a highly effective approach relying on an attacker’s deliberate exploitation of a single human error. Despite decades of research on risk perception and behavior, little has been done to transfer existing insights on human factors to secure individuals and organizations in the digital space. Many foundational concepts central to our research community, such as uncertainty, risk compensation, and risk as affect are still underrepresented in the current cybersecurity discourse. Thus, we shed light on concepts that can address today’s challenges to increase cyber resilience, such as the use of heuristics to detect incidents or mental models to enable target group-oriented risk communication. As a starting point, we formulate research questions that aim to transfer risk frameworks and methodologies to cybersecurity to pave the way for new approaches to cyber risk management, better security tools, and effective security policies.

Journal of Risk ResearchVol. 28(8)
ETH Zurich (CH), Human Factors (Norway) (NO), Health Decisions (United States) (US)
Kanton Zürich, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Risk Perception and Management
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human behavior in cybersecurity: an opportunity for risk research — Nico Ebert, Benjamin Ambuehl, et al. · Journal of Risk Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS