Are consumers willing to pay more for sustainable wine? A pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis

The importance of sustainability in the wine sector has gradually increased in recent years, due to significant pressure from the market, regulators and a changing climate . Given significant investments and risks that wineries face to transition towards sustainable production practices, numerous studies have investigated consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for sustainably produced wine. Most of these studies focus on the environmental pillar of sustainability, while attention to the social pillar is more recent. In this context, our paper aims to fill an important research gap: no meta-analysis has analysed the WTP for sustainably produced wine, considering social and environmental dimensions as well as differentiating between pure claims, actual practices and certified actions. Our results are heterogeneous indicating a WTP of 15 % (95 CI, 13 %–18 %) for sustainably produced wine based on 146 effect sizes. That is, price premia depend on a number of methodological and substantive moderators, with the latter primarily explaining WTP heterogeneity. Key moderators include the data collection year, the use of certified labels vs generic claims and declarations regarding sustainable practices. To a lesser extent, organic certifications, the study location, respondents' wine consumption frequency and the number of sustainability attributes examined are also influential. Our results can guide researchers in the field to optimize study designs, wineries to valorise their sustainability efforts and policy makers to support the wine sector's sustainable transition. • Consumers are willing to pay a premium of 15 % (95 % CI, 13 %–18 %) for wine with sustainability attributes on average. • The premium is higher for certified sustainable wines, especially organic ones. • Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable wine has increased over time. • Consumers who drink wine more frequently are willing to pay a greater premium for sustainability attributes. • European and Asian consumers show a higher willingness to pay for sustainable wine compared to consumers in other continents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105655
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wine Industry and Tourism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are consumers willing to pay more for sustainable wine? A pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis

Isabel Schäufele, Guenter Schamel, Michael Bošnjak, Giulia Gastaldello
4 citations
Food Quality and Preference
Wine Industry and Tourism
14.25
article

Are consumers willing to pay more for sustainable wine? A pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis

Isabel Schäufele, Guenter Schamel, Michael Bošnjak, Giulia Gastaldello
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The importance of sustainability in the wine sector has gradually increased in recent years, due to significant pressure from the market, regulators and a changing climate . Given significant investments and risks that wineries face to transition towards sustainable production practices, numerous studies have investigated consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for sustainably produced wine. Most of these studies focus on the environmental pillar of sustainability, while attention to the social pillar is more recent. In this context, our paper aims to fill an important research gap: no meta-analysis has analysed the WTP for sustainably produced wine, considering social and environmental dimensions as well as differentiating between pure claims, actual practices and certified actions. Our results are heterogeneous indicating a WTP of 15 % (95 CI, 13 %–18 %) for sustainably produced wine based on 146 effect sizes. That is, price premia depend on a number of methodological and substantive moderators, with the latter primarily explaining WTP heterogeneity. Key moderators include the data collection year, the use of certified labels vs generic claims and declarations regarding sustainable practices. To a lesser extent, organic certifications, the study location, respondents' wine consumption frequency and the number of sustainability attributes examined are also influential. Our results can guide researchers in the field to optimize study designs, wineries to valorise their sustainability efforts and policy makers to support the wine sector's sustainable transition. • Consumers are willing to pay a premium of 15 % (95 % CI, 13 %–18 %) for wine with sustainability attributes on average. • The premium is higher for certified sustainable wines, especially organic ones. • Consumer willingness to pay for sustainable wine has increased over time. • Consumers who drink wine more frequently are willing to pay a greater premium for sustainability attributes. • European and Asian consumers show a higher willingness to pay for sustainable wine compared to consumers in other continents.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 134
University of Ljubljana (SI), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Universität Trier (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Wine Industry and Tourism
14.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.