CERAMICS AND METALS IN ORTHOPEDICS: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BIOMATERIALS IN ENDOPROSTHESES

This review explores the use of ceramics and metals as biomaterials in endoprosthetics, evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of each material according to orthopedic needs. Ceramic is preferred for its high biocompatibility and wear resistance, thus reducing the risk of inflammation and providing optimal performance in mobile joints such as the hip. However, its fragility and high costs pose major challenges, limiting its use to patients with a less active lifestyle. Metals, such as titanium and cobalt-chromium alloys, are known for their durability and ability to withstand high loads, making them ideal for active patients. Disadvantages include excessive stiffness, which can lead to bone loss, and the potential release of metal ions, which can cause inflammatory reactions. Recent innovations, such as nanotechnology and 3D printing, have improved the adaptability and durability of implants, allowing for increased customization and more efficient integration into the body. The choice of material must be customized for each patient, taking into account lifestyle, physical activities and long-term risks, to ensure optimal recovery and extended life of the endoprosthesis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine and Materials
Published
2024-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36868/medmater.2024.04.03.119
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CERAMICS AND METALS IN ORTHOPEDICS: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BIOMATERIALS IN ENDOPROSTHESES

Laura Elisabeta Checheriță, Doriana Agop Forna, Lawrence Chukwudi NWABUDIKE
5 citations
Medicine and Materials
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.86
article

CERAMICS AND METALS IN ORTHOPEDICS: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF BIOMATERIALS IN ENDOPROSTHESES

Laura Elisabeta Checheriță, Doriana Agop Forna, Lawrence Chukwudi NWABUDIKE
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This review explores the use of ceramics and metals as biomaterials in endoprosthetics, evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of each material according to orthopedic needs. Ceramic is preferred for its high biocompatibility and wear resistance, thus reducing the risk of inflammation and providing optimal performance in mobile joints such as the hip. However, its fragility and high costs pose major challenges, limiting its use to patients with a less active lifestyle. Metals, such as titanium and cobalt-chromium alloys, are known for their durability and ability to withstand high loads, making them ideal for active patients. Disadvantages include excessive stiffness, which can lead to bone loss, and the potential release of metal ions, which can cause inflammatory reactions. Recent innovations, such as nanotechnology and 3D printing, have improved the adaptability and durability of implants, allowing for increased customization and more efficient integration into the body. The choice of material must be customized for each patient, taking into account lifestyle, physical activities and long-term risks, to ensure optimal recovery and extended life of the endoprosthesis.

Medicine and MaterialsVol. 4(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.