Diagnostic Performance of Uric Acid‐to‐Albumin Ratio for Detecting the Presence and Severity of Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential utility of the uric acid‐to‐albumin ratio (UAR) in identifying isolated coronary artery ectasia (iCAE) and to compare its performance with that of conventional inflammatory markers. Objective: In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the power of UAR to predict iCAE. Methods: A total of 440 patients were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Of the subjects, 110 were in the iCAE group, 110 were in the obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) group accompanied by CAE, 110 were in the pure obstructive CAD group, and the remaining 110 were in the group with normal coronary artery on angiography. The groups were compared with each other in terms of UAR and traditional inflammatory markers. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables were compared using the independent Student’s t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, where appropriate. Bonferroni and Brown–Forsythe post hoc tests were applied for multiple group comparisons. Categorical variables were analyzed with the χ 2 test. Results: UAR levels were significantly higher in the iCAE group compared with the other groups ( p < 0.05, for all). UAR levels were significantly higher in Markis I classification, which is the group with the highest severity of iCAE, compared with Markis II‐III‐IV. In Spearman’s correlation analysis, a moderate but significant positive correlation was found between UAR and CRP ( r = 0.186, p < 0.001). UAR was identified as an independent risk factor for iCAE in the regression analysis (OR: 7.166; CI: 6.996–13.892; < 0.001). Conclusion: UAR was found to be superior to traditional biomarkers. UAR may be an important biomarker in the etiopathogenesis of iCAE and a useful biomarker in clinical practice that can lead to the identification of high‐risk individuals for iCAE and to take intensive preventive measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/ijcp/4936529
Primary Topic
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Performance of Uric Acid‐to‐Albumin Ratio for Detecting the Presence and Severity of Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia

Kenan Toprak, Mesut Karataş
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
article

Diagnostic Performance of Uric Acid‐to‐Albumin Ratio for Detecting the Presence and Severity of Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia

Kenan Toprak, Mesut Karataş
article en

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential utility of the uric acid‐to‐albumin ratio (UAR) in identifying isolated coronary artery ectasia (iCAE) and to compare its performance with that of conventional inflammatory markers. Objective: In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the power of UAR to predict iCAE. Methods: A total of 440 patients were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Of the subjects, 110 were in the iCAE group, 110 were in the obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) group accompanied by CAE, 110 were in the pure obstructive CAD group, and the remaining 110 were in the group with normal coronary artery on angiography. The groups were compared with each other in terms of UAR and traditional inflammatory markers. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables were compared using the independent Student’s t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Kruskal–Wallis test, where appropriate. Bonferroni and Brown–Forsythe post hoc tests were applied for multiple group comparisons. Categorical variables were analyzed with the χ 2 test. Results: UAR levels were significantly higher in the iCAE group compared with the other groups ( p < 0.05, for all). UAR levels were significantly higher in Markis I classification, which is the group with the highest severity of iCAE, compared with Markis II‐III‐IV. In Spearman’s correlation analysis, a moderate but significant positive correlation was found between UAR and CRP ( r = 0.186, p < 0.001). UAR was identified as an independent risk factor for iCAE in the regression analysis (OR: 7.166; CI: 6.996–13.892; < 0.001). Conclusion: UAR was found to be superior to traditional biomarkers. UAR may be an important biomarker in the etiopathogenesis of iCAE and a useful biomarker in clinical practice that can lead to the identification of high‐risk individuals for iCAE and to take intensive preventive measures.

International Journal of Clinical PracticeVol. 2025(1)
Kartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital (TR), Harran University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Kawasaki Disease and Coronary Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.