Seeing emerging comprehenders: Refining reading comprehension assessment in international contexts

There is little consensus on the optimal approach to measuring reading comprehension in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and significant scholarly debate surrounds the approach used by the Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA). Concerns focus on the EGRA task’s conflation of reading speed with comprehension and the high rates of zero scores it produces. This study investigates three reading comprehension measures among 3rd and 4th grade students in Mali and Senegal, across their first and second languages. The approaches include the standard EGRA task (a timed oral reading fluency plus comprehension measure), a modified version allowing students to look back at the text to answer questions, and a new, untimed picture-matching task. We employ Item Response Theory analysis to assess item difficulty and discrimination, and quantile regression analysis to examine relative sensitivity to students’ literacy sub-skills across tasks and languages. Results show that the picture-matching task more effectively measures comprehension among students at lower ability levels and is highly sensitive to slow decoders, while the standard EGRA task is more sensitive to strong decoders but fails to capture slow readers' comprehension skills. We conclude that combining the EGRA and picture-matching tasks provides a broader and more accurate measurement of students' reading comprehension abilities, helping to correct key limitations of the standard EGRA approach. These findings have significant implications for policy and practice and better understanding LMIC students’ reading abilities, progress, and the efficacy of literacy interventions. • EGRA fails to detect the reading comprehension (RC) skills of slow decoders. • High ratios of LMIC students show comprehension on a scaffolded, untimed assessment. • Tasks have variable sensitivity to students RC skills with high versus low decoding. • EGRA may underestimate programs’ reading comprehension effects on slow decoders. • EGRA’s comprehension test may overstate reading comprehension failure in LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Educational Development
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103373
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeing emerging comprehenders: Refining reading comprehension assessment in international contexts

Jill M. Pentimonti, Pooja Nakamura, TJ D’Agostino, Tracy Brunette et al.
International Journal of Educational Development
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Seeing emerging comprehenders: Refining reading comprehension assessment in international contexts

Jill M. Pentimonti, Pooja Nakamura, TJ D’Agostino, Tracy Brunette, Caroline L. Donovan, Cheng Liu, Fernanda Soares, Brianna Conaghan
article en

Abstract

There is little consensus on the optimal approach to measuring reading comprehension in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and significant scholarly debate surrounds the approach used by the Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA). Concerns focus on the EGRA task’s conflation of reading speed with comprehension and the high rates of zero scores it produces. This study investigates three reading comprehension measures among 3rd and 4th grade students in Mali and Senegal, across their first and second languages. The approaches include the standard EGRA task (a timed oral reading fluency plus comprehension measure), a modified version allowing students to look back at the text to answer questions, and a new, untimed picture-matching task. We employ Item Response Theory analysis to assess item difficulty and discrimination, and quantile regression analysis to examine relative sensitivity to students’ literacy sub-skills across tasks and languages. Results show that the picture-matching task more effectively measures comprehension among students at lower ability levels and is highly sensitive to slow decoders, while the standard EGRA task is more sensitive to strong decoders but fails to capture slow readers' comprehension skills. We conclude that combining the EGRA and picture-matching tasks provides a broader and more accurate measurement of students' reading comprehension abilities, helping to correct key limitations of the standard EGRA approach. These findings have significant implications for policy and practice and better understanding LMIC students’ reading abilities, progress, and the efficacy of literacy interventions. • EGRA fails to detect the reading comprehension (RC) skills of slow decoders. • High ratios of LMIC students show comprehension on a scaffolded, untimed assessment. • Tasks have variable sensitivity to students RC skills with high versus low decoding. • EGRA may underestimate programs’ reading comprehension effects on slow decoders. • EGRA’s comprehension test may overstate reading comprehension failure in LMICs.

International Journal of Educational DevelopmentVol. 117
University of Notre Dame (US), American Institutes for Research (US), Center for Global Development (US), Development Initiatives (GB)
United States Agency for International Development
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.