Usage and perceived effectiveness of recruitment techniques among clinical trials recruiters
Our findings indicate that there is significant variation in the usage of clinical trial recruitment techniques and how different recruiters view the effectiveness of each technique. The unique perspectives of those who recruit into clinical trials can help inform future decisions regarding which recruitment techniques to utilize, along with how and when to use particular recruitment techniques in an ethical manner.
Authors
- Erin Rothwell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-2299)
- Ben Schwan
- Jewels Watts
- Kimberly A. Kaphingst (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9080)
- Aaron J. Goldenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0314-0303)
- Bob Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1386-4505)
- Cathy Wolfsfeld
- Maxwell J. Mehlman
- Eric Kodish
- Molly Volkmar
- Lauren Kaiser‐Jackson
- Jessica Berg
- Azra Helac
Institutions
- MetroHealth (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Metro Health Hospital (US)
- Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US)
- University School (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10117
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in Clinical Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences