Building Inclusive Competence Among Higher Education Teachers

Introduction: providing assistance to students with special educational needs in higher education institutions and supporting their professional growth are effectively implemented under conditions of high-quality teacher training tailored to working with this category of students. The article addressed the problem of inclusive education in higher education, emphasizing the involvement of pedagogical hierarchical relationships that included students with disabilities in Ukraine. Methods: the study employed interviews, comparative analysis of teachers’ knowledge levels before and after specialized professional development, and analysis of the data obtained. Results: the article presented a concept for training teachers for inclusive activities, which consisted of five elements: informational and educational, analytical and practical, engineering and technological, psychological and social, and monitoring and analytical. Implementing this model contributed to the development of teachers’ professional competencies in creating and applying inclusive education systems. It also ensured their readiness for professional work with students with special educational needs. Three levels were identified to measure such readiness: basic, intermediate, and advanced. Statistical analysis based on Pearson’s criterion was applied to assess the dynamics of changes in four parameters: content-theoretical, technological-practical, social-psychological, and generalizing-analytical. Conclusions: comparative results before and after using the model demonstrated an increase in the level of teacher preparedness across all problem areas. This preparedness was formulated through a comprehensive approach that integrated theoretical knowledge of inclusion, practical teaching methods (didactic, technical, technological, and psychological), and the adaptation and development of analytical skills essential for creating individualized educational pathways for students with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Leadership and Quality of Life
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56294/hl2025706
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building Inclusive Competence Among Higher Education Teachers

Natalia Savinova, Olena Pozdnіakova, Olena Mamicheva, Liudmyla Potenko et al.
Health Leadership and Quality of Life
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
article

Building Inclusive Competence Among Higher Education Teachers

Natalia Savinova, Olena Pozdnіakova, Olena Mamicheva, Liudmyla Potenko, Mariia Berehova
article en

Abstract

Introduction: providing assistance to students with special educational needs in higher education institutions and supporting their professional growth are effectively implemented under conditions of high-quality teacher training tailored to working with this category of students. The article addressed the problem of inclusive education in higher education, emphasizing the involvement of pedagogical hierarchical relationships that included students with disabilities in Ukraine. Methods: the study employed interviews, comparative analysis of teachers’ knowledge levels before and after specialized professional development, and analysis of the data obtained. Results: the article presented a concept for training teachers for inclusive activities, which consisted of five elements: informational and educational, analytical and practical, engineering and technological, psychological and social, and monitoring and analytical. Implementing this model contributed to the development of teachers’ professional competencies in creating and applying inclusive education systems. It also ensured their readiness for professional work with students with special educational needs. Three levels were identified to measure such readiness: basic, intermediate, and advanced. Statistical analysis based on Pearson’s criterion was applied to assess the dynamics of changes in four parameters: content-theoretical, technological-practical, social-psychological, and generalizing-analytical. Conclusions: comparative results before and after using the model demonstrated an increase in the level of teacher preparedness across all problem areas. This preparedness was formulated through a comprehensive approach that integrated theoretical knowledge of inclusion, practical teaching methods (didactic, technical, technological, and psychological), and the adaptation and development of analytical skills essential for creating individualized educational pathways for students with disabilities.

Health Leadership and Quality of LifeVol. 4
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University (UA), Donbas State Pedagogical University (UA), Zaporizhzhya State Engineering Academy (UA), National University Odesa Law Academy (UA), Zaporizhzhia National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.