Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement among Class II Obese Women: A Single-Blinded Randomized

Background: The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is the most widely used reversible contraceptive, with around 120 million users worldwide. Its popularity stems from its high efficacy, reversibility, and proven safety. However, pain during insertion can limit its use, particularly among obese women. To address this, both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic pain management strategies are employed, with paracervical block being a common technique that is regarded as both safe and easy to perform during IUCD insertion.Aim: To assess the effectiveness of paracervical block for management of pain during IUCD insertion in class II obese women..Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the family planning clinic, Obstetrics and Gynecology department of Ain Shams hospitals during the period from 1/1/2024 to 31/12/2024. A total of 140 women undergoing IUCD insertion were divided into two groups: Group A (non-intervention group): Includes 70 women who didn’t receive and local anethesia. Group B (intervention group): Includes 70 women who received paracervical block before IUCD insertion.Results: The demographic characteristics of participants in both groups were comparable, Women who received the paracervical block reported less pain with IUCD insertion compared to women who received no block (median VAS: 3 vs. 5, p<0.0001), they also experienced less pain during vulsellum application (median VAS: 1 vs. 2, p<0.0001), uterine sounding (median VAS: 2.5 vs. 3, p<0.0001) and five minutes post-insertion (median VAS: 1 vs. 3, p<0.0001) which is statistically significant, However, there was no statistically significant perceived pain difference during specu-lum insertion (median VAS: 4 vs. 3, p=0.3248).Conclusion: 20 ml lidocaine 1% paracervical block significantly decreased perceived pain during IUCD insertion compared to no intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evidence Based Women s Health Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2025.394950.1473
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement among Class II Obese Women: A Single-Blinded Randomized

Tarek Tamara, Sherif Ashoush, Ebtihal Eltaieb, Amr Ayyad
Evidence Based Women s Health Journal
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement among Class II Obese Women: A Single-Blinded Randomized

Tarek Tamara, Sherif Ashoush, Ebtihal Eltaieb, Amr Ayyad
article en

Abstract

Background: The intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is the most widely used reversible contraceptive, with around 120 million users worldwide. Its popularity stems from its high efficacy, reversibility, and proven safety. However, pain during insertion can limit its use, particularly among obese women. To address this, both non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic pain management strategies are employed, with paracervical block being a common technique that is regarded as both safe and easy to perform during IUCD insertion.Aim: To assess the effectiveness of paracervical block for management of pain during IUCD insertion in class II obese women..Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at the family planning clinic, Obstetrics and Gynecology department of Ain Shams hospitals during the period from 1/1/2024 to 31/12/2024. A total of 140 women undergoing IUCD insertion were divided into two groups: Group A (non-intervention group): Includes 70 women who didn’t receive and local anethesia. Group B (intervention group): Includes 70 women who received paracervical block before IUCD insertion.Results: The demographic characteristics of participants in both groups were comparable, Women who received the paracervical block reported less pain with IUCD insertion compared to women who received no block (median VAS: 3 vs. 5, p<0.0001), they also experienced less pain during vulsellum application (median VAS: 1 vs. 2, p<0.0001), uterine sounding (median VAS: 2.5 vs. 3, p<0.0001) and five minutes post-insertion (median VAS: 1 vs. 3, p<0.0001) which is statistically significant, However, there was no statistically significant perceived pain difference during specu-lum insertion (median VAS: 4 vs. 3, p=0.3248).Conclusion: 20 ml lidocaine 1% paracervical block significantly decreased perceived pain during IUCD insertion compared to no intervention.

Evidence Based Women s Health JournalVol. 15(15)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paracervical Block for Intrauterine Device Placement among Class II Obese Women: A Single-Blinded Randomized — Tarek Tamara, Sherif Ashoush, et al. · Evidence Based Women s Health Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS