Pragmatic Diversification in ASEAN: Strategic Responses to Trade War Ripple Effects in 2025

This study explores how selected ASEAN countries Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand strategically diversified their trade partnerships in response to the global trade war ripple effects in 2025. Amid intensifying geopolitical tension, technological decoupling, and rising non-tariff trade barriers, these countries have adopted distinct strategies: Vietnam pursues export-led realignment, Indonesia promotes resource-based sovereignty, and Thailand engages in hybrid sectoral diplomacy. Through qualitative content analysis of trade policy documents and institutional reports, the study identifies a shared pattern of reduced dependence on traditional powers while highlighting the fragmented nature of ASEAN-wide coordination. The findings offer new insights into "pragmatic diversification"—a flexible and nationally calibrated trade strategy. Although ASEAN's collective frameworks remain secondary to national priorities, the country-level strategies show promise for enhancing regional resilience. The study contributes to the literature by connecting strategic trade theory with current policy evidence, offering a forward-looking, comparative assessment of diversification under trade war disruption. It concludes with implications for regional policy coherence and institutional capacity building

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Business Management and Innovation Review
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62951/ijbmir.v2i2.127
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Diversification in ASEAN: Strategic Responses to Trade War Ripple Effects in 2025

Hengki Mangiring Parulian Simarmata, Poltak Pardamean Simarmata
2 citations
International Journal Business Management and Innovation Review
Global trade and economics
6.17
article

Pragmatic Diversification in ASEAN: Strategic Responses to Trade War Ripple Effects in 2025

Hengki Mangiring Parulian Simarmata, Poltak Pardamean Simarmata
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores how selected ASEAN countries Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand strategically diversified their trade partnerships in response to the global trade war ripple effects in 2025. Amid intensifying geopolitical tension, technological decoupling, and rising non-tariff trade barriers, these countries have adopted distinct strategies: Vietnam pursues export-led realignment, Indonesia promotes resource-based sovereignty, and Thailand engages in hybrid sectoral diplomacy. Through qualitative content analysis of trade policy documents and institutional reports, the study identifies a shared pattern of reduced dependence on traditional powers while highlighting the fragmented nature of ASEAN-wide coordination. The findings offer new insights into "pragmatic diversification"—a flexible and nationally calibrated trade strategy. Although ASEAN's collective frameworks remain secondary to national priorities, the country-level strategies show promise for enhancing regional resilience. The study contributes to the literature by connecting strategic trade theory with current policy evidence, offering a forward-looking, comparative assessment of diversification under trade war disruption. It concludes with implications for regional policy coherence and institutional capacity building

International Journal Business Management and Innovation ReviewVol. 2(2)
Universitas Simalungun (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade and economics
6.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.