Prosocial Behavior as a Protective Factor: Profiling Peer Bullying Risk in Elementary School
Prosocial behavior is a critical component of children’s social and emotional development, fostering positive peer interactions and serving as a protective factor against bullying. While prior studies have explored prosociality, peer bullying, and digital media use separately, few have simultaneously examined these dimensions using a profile-based, cluster analytic approach in primary school populations. This study aimed to investigate prosocial behavior among fourth-grade students in relation to gender, bullying involvement (as perpetrator or victim), violent game exposure, digital device ownership, and daily screen time, and to identify prosociality-focused student profiles based on combined behavioral and digital risk factors. Participants were 229 students (52.4% girls) from seven primary schools. Data were collected using a Personal Information Form, the Child Prosocial Behavior Scale, and the Peer Bullying Self-Report Scale. Analyses included independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA with Scheffé post-hoc tests, and Two-Step Cluster Analysis. Results revealed that prosociality was significantly lower among boys, students exposed to violent games, and those involved in bullying, with a moderate effect of extended daily screen time. Cluster analysis identified two distinct profiles: Low Prosociality–High Risk (predominantly boys, high bullying involvement, extensive violent-game exposure and screen use) and High Prosociality-Low Risk (predominantly girls, minimal digital and social risks).
Authors
- Sacide Güzin Mazman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-221X)
- Ceyhun Bekir Can (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3544-9679)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
- Published
- 2025-08-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.4.4765
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Child Development and Digital Technology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.93