Simulation and Optimization of Methanol Production Processes

Abstract Addressing high energy use and inefficient distillation in methanol production, this study innovatively integrates modeling, dividing‐wall column (DWC) technology, and energy optimization for a 400 000 t/a plant. Developed integrated synthesis‐distillation model replaces traditional atmospheric column with DWC. Process simulation optimized key parameters: pressure, temperature, recycle ratio, feedstock (CO 2 /CO), and water dosage. A DWC dynamic control system ensured stability, whereas plant‐wide energy optimization was implemented. Results: DWC boosted top‐product methanol yield 9.22 %, total output 5.14 %, and cut fusel oil methanol 62.73 %. Energy optimization reduced utilities 35.63 % (heating −36.69 % and cooling −34.59 %), raised inter‐stream heat recovery 4.85×, and lowered emissions 42.29 %. Strong economics: NPV > 0 and IRR > 12 %. This process effectively reduces energy consumption and improves yield, providing a feasible solution for clean production of industrial methanol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.70095
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation and Optimization of Methanol Production Processes

Xingchao Chen, H. Zhang
Chemical Engineering & Technology
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Simulation and Optimization of Methanol Production Processes

Xingchao Chen, H. Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Addressing high energy use and inefficient distillation in methanol production, this study innovatively integrates modeling, dividing‐wall column (DWC) technology, and energy optimization for a 400 000 t/a plant. Developed integrated synthesis‐distillation model replaces traditional atmospheric column with DWC. Process simulation optimized key parameters: pressure, temperature, recycle ratio, feedstock (CO 2 /CO), and water dosage. A DWC dynamic control system ensured stability, whereas plant‐wide energy optimization was implemented. Results: DWC boosted top‐product methanol yield 9.22 %, total output 5.14 %, and cut fusel oil methanol 62.73 %. Energy optimization reduced utilities 35.63 % (heating −36.69 % and cooling −34.59 %), raised inter‐stream heat recovery 4.85×, and lowered emissions 42.29 %. Strong economics: NPV > 0 and IRR > 12 %. This process effectively reduces energy consumption and improves yield, providing a feasible solution for clean production of industrial methanol.

Chemical Engineering & TechnologyVol. 48(8)
Huaibei Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.