On the origin of certain Early Iron Age populations of Western Siberia. Part II . Diachronic analysis

Fourteen measurements of ten male Early Iron Age cranial samples from Western Siberia — early Bol’shaya Rechka (Zavyalovskaya), three Kamen’, three Sargat, Gorokhovo, Kashino, and Kulay — were compared with those of 28 Bronze Age samples from Western Siberia and other areas using the D2 distance measure corrected for sample size. The D2 matrix was subjected to nonmetric multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Results suggest that all analyzed groups except early Bol’shaya Rechka and Kulay were likely descendants of local Late Bronze Age populations, which had originated through admixture between earlier Western Siberian autochthones and Andronovo immigrants. The early Bol’shaya Rechka group from Bobrovka, while resembling people of the Kamenny Log stage of Karasuk culture, could, like the latter, have originated via admixture between Andronovans and people of Okunev culture. Three Kamen’ groups, which are close to each other, contrast with early Bol’shaya Rechka, displaying a markedly Kulay (or aboriginal Baraba) tendency. Also, they included a Saka component. Sargat might have originated from Irmen’. The Gorokhovo sample is indistinguishable from Sargat. Kashino resembles the Late Bronze Age (possibly Begazy-Dandybai) group from Yelovka I. Kulay is close to the aborigines of Baraba. Their relatives had been displaced from the forest-steppe to the taiga or the Altai-Sayan highland (Kopto, Kara-Koba culture). Others, like the southern Kulay people, eventually returned from the taiga to the forest-steppe. If they were Samoyeds, then the admixed groups which had displaced them were mostly Ugrian or Indo-Iranian speakers. The early Bol’shaya Rechka people resemble those of the late (Kamenny Log) stage of the Karasuk culture. They could have spoken a Yeniseian or, because the influence of Andronovo increased at the Kamenny Log stage, an Indo-Iranian language. But if the Bol’shaya Rechka people were Yeniseian speakers, which is quite probable, then those of Kulay, who are quite dissimilar to them, must have spoken a different language — likely Samoyed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Camera praehistorica
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31250/2658-3828-2025-1-144-156
Primary Topic
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the origin of certain Early Iron Age populations of Western Siberia. Part II . Diachronic analysis

Alexander Kozintsev
Camera praehistorica
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
article

On the origin of certain Early Iron Age populations of Western Siberia. Part II . Diachronic analysis

Alexander Kozintsev
article en

Abstract

Fourteen measurements of ten male Early Iron Age cranial samples from Western Siberia — early Bol’shaya Rechka (Zavyalovskaya), three Kamen’, three Sargat, Gorokhovo, Kashino, and Kulay — were compared with those of 28 Bronze Age samples from Western Siberia and other areas using the D2 distance measure corrected for sample size. The D2 matrix was subjected to nonmetric multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. Results suggest that all analyzed groups except early Bol’shaya Rechka and Kulay were likely descendants of local Late Bronze Age populations, which had originated through admixture between earlier Western Siberian autochthones and Andronovo immigrants. The early Bol’shaya Rechka group from Bobrovka, while resembling people of the Kamenny Log stage of Karasuk culture, could, like the latter, have originated via admixture between Andronovans and people of Okunev culture. Three Kamen’ groups, which are close to each other, contrast with early Bol’shaya Rechka, displaying a markedly Kulay (or aboriginal Baraba) tendency. Also, they included a Saka component. Sargat might have originated from Irmen’. The Gorokhovo sample is indistinguishable from Sargat. Kashino resembles the Late Bronze Age (possibly Begazy-Dandybai) group from Yelovka I. Kulay is close to the aborigines of Baraba. Their relatives had been displaced from the forest-steppe to the taiga or the Altai-Sayan highland (Kopto, Kara-Koba culture). Others, like the southern Kulay people, eventually returned from the taiga to the forest-steppe. If they were Samoyeds, then the admixed groups which had displaced them were mostly Ugrian or Indo-Iranian speakers. The early Bol’shaya Rechka people resemble those of the late (Kamenny Log) stage of the Karasuk culture. They could have spoken a Yeniseian or, because the influence of Andronovo increased at the Kamenny Log stage, an Indo-Iranian language. But if the Bol’shaya Rechka people were Yeniseian speakers, which is quite probable, then those of Kulay, who are quite dissimilar to them, must have spoken a different language — likely Samoyed.

Camera praehistoricaVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the origin of certain Early Iron Age populations of Western Siberia. Part II . Diachronic analysis — Alexander Kozintsev · Camera praehistorica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS