Sustainable development of economic systems: Essential content and evaluation criteria

Aim . The work aimed to present the analysis and essential content of the concept of “sustainable development” and to determine the criteria for its evaluation. Objectives. The work seeks to analyze the features of the concept of sustainable development of economic systems in modern conditions, to identify aspects of the crisis of the concept of sustainable development, to study the content of the core of the terminological field, namely the content of the concepts of “sustainable development,” “sustainability,” “resilience,” to differentiate them and determine the criteria for their evaluation. Methods . The scientific provisions presented in the article are obtained using the basic provisions of the concept of sustainable development and the ESG agenda, the theory of management of economic systems, the theory of assessing the effectiveness of economic actors, management of environmental and social development of economic systems, expounded in the works of famous Russian and international scientists. In the study course, the authors used the methods of scientific literature analysis. Results. It was revealed that the concept of sustainable development is currently not effective sufficiently, which is recognized by both scientists and the initiating organization (UN). The significance of the essential content of the concepts of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” “resilience” is determined, since a methodology and tools for assessment cannot be formulated due to the absence of clear definitions. A comparative analysis of the content of the concepts of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” and “resilience” proposed by various scientists is performed, and a conclusion is made about the need to differentiate these concepts. The author’s statement of the content of the concepts of “sustainable development” (the development process focused on sustainability and implying balanced actions to manage the activities of the economic system) is proposed. The work proposes the criteria for assessing the concepts of “sustainability” (maintaining the main characteristics of the economic system in values close to the state of equilibrium, as a result of an adequate response to internal and external changes), “sustainable development” (study and maintenance of the process, in this connection the dynamic characteristics of the selected indicators are important), and “resilience” (initial and satisfactory values of indicators recognized as equilibrium, the system’s response to external shock effects). Conclusions . An essential definition of the concept of “sustainable development” is formulated, the categories of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” and “resilience” are differentiated, and the criteria for their assessment are defined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics and Management
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2025-7-834-853
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable development of economic systems: Essential content and evaluation criteria

Галина Степановна Мерзликина, A. V. Babkin
1 citations
Economics and Management
Regional resilience and development
3.13
article

Sustainable development of economic systems: Essential content and evaluation criteria

Галина Степановна Мерзликина, A. V. Babkin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim . The work aimed to present the analysis and essential content of the concept of “sustainable development” and to determine the criteria for its evaluation. Objectives. The work seeks to analyze the features of the concept of sustainable development of economic systems in modern conditions, to identify aspects of the crisis of the concept of sustainable development, to study the content of the core of the terminological field, namely the content of the concepts of “sustainable development,” “sustainability,” “resilience,” to differentiate them and determine the criteria for their evaluation. Methods . The scientific provisions presented in the article are obtained using the basic provisions of the concept of sustainable development and the ESG agenda, the theory of management of economic systems, the theory of assessing the effectiveness of economic actors, management of environmental and social development of economic systems, expounded in the works of famous Russian and international scientists. In the study course, the authors used the methods of scientific literature analysis. Results. It was revealed that the concept of sustainable development is currently not effective sufficiently, which is recognized by both scientists and the initiating organization (UN). The significance of the essential content of the concepts of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” “resilience” is determined, since a methodology and tools for assessment cannot be formulated due to the absence of clear definitions. A comparative analysis of the content of the concepts of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” and “resilience” proposed by various scientists is performed, and a conclusion is made about the need to differentiate these concepts. The author’s statement of the content of the concepts of “sustainable development” (the development process focused on sustainability and implying balanced actions to manage the activities of the economic system) is proposed. The work proposes the criteria for assessing the concepts of “sustainability” (maintaining the main characteristics of the economic system in values close to the state of equilibrium, as a result of an adequate response to internal and external changes), “sustainable development” (study and maintenance of the process, in this connection the dynamic characteristics of the selected indicators are important), and “resilience” (initial and satisfactory values of indicators recognized as equilibrium, the system’s response to external shock effects). Conclusions . An essential definition of the concept of “sustainable development” is formulated, the categories of “sustainability,” “sustainable development,” and “resilience” are differentiated, and the criteria for their assessment are defined.

Economics and ManagementVol. 31(7)
Volgograd State Technical University (RU), Saint Petersburg University of Management and Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Regional resilience and development
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.