The challenges of identifying intentional blade fragmentation in Paleolithic industries

Fragmented tools and blanks are widely found in the assemblages of the Stone age sites. It is therefore vital that researchers are equipped with the necessary knowledge to assess the nature of such fragmentation. However, the available data on this issue is limited and somewhat contradictory, which leaves this important question unanswered at the moment.The primary objective of the current study was ascertaining whether the identification of intentionally fragmented blanks is feasible. This study is based on statistical analysis of experimentally fragmented blades of various types. The results suggest that there is no statistically significant difference in the morphology of blades fragmented by different methods. With regard to the analysis of archaeological assemblages, this indicates that demonstrating intentional blade fragmentation is a highly challenging task, and therefore should be better avoided.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Camera praehistorica
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31250/2658-3828-2025-1-26-41
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The challenges of identifying intentional blade fragmentation in Paleolithic industries

Anton Lada
1 links
Camera praehistorica
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

The challenges of identifying intentional blade fragmentation in Paleolithic industries

Anton Lada
article en

Abstract

Fragmented tools and blanks are widely found in the assemblages of the Stone age sites. It is therefore vital that researchers are equipped with the necessary knowledge to assess the nature of such fragmentation. However, the available data on this issue is limited and somewhat contradictory, which leaves this important question unanswered at the moment.The primary objective of the current study was ascertaining whether the identification of intentionally fragmented blanks is feasible. This study is based on statistical analysis of experimentally fragmented blades of various types. The results suggest that there is no statistically significant difference in the morphology of blades fragmented by different methods. With regard to the analysis of archaeological assemblages, this indicates that demonstrating intentional blade fragmentation is a highly challenging task, and therefore should be better avoided.

Camera praehistoricaVol. 14(1)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The challenges of identifying intentional blade fragmentation in Paleolithic industries — Anton Lada · Camera praehistorica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS