Comparative Analysis of Control Structures in Core Annular Flow Systems: A CFD Simulation Study

This paper investigates the application of two distinct control structures, conventional single-layer control and cascade control, in a Core Annular Flow (CAF) system simulated through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Both control strategies were tested and carried out open-loop tests to tune the controllers following the SIMC rules. Results demonstrate that both structures, one I controller for the oil fraction and one cascade controller PI-I for the velocity ratio and the oil fraction, successfully controlled the system, each exhibiting unique behaviors and performance characteristics. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each approach, where the single-layer structure with an I controller was faster to reach the setpoint and was efficient to reject disturbances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.128
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Control Structures in Core Annular Flow Systems: A CFD Simulation Study

Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira, Sigurd Skogestad, Patrick Souza Lima, Lucas Ferreira Bernardino
1 citations
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Heat Transfer and Optimization
0.71
article

Comparative Analysis of Control Structures in Core Annular Flow Systems: A CFD Simulation Study

Idelfonso B. R. Nogueira, Sigurd Skogestad, Patrick Souza Lima, Lucas Ferreira Bernardino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of two distinct control structures, conventional single-layer control and cascade control, in a Core Annular Flow (CAF) system simulated through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Both control strategies were tested and carried out open-loop tests to tune the controllers following the SIMC rules. Results demonstrate that both structures, one I controller for the oil fraction and one cascade controller PI-I for the velocity ratio and the oil fraction, successfully controlled the system, each exhibiting unique behaviors and performance characteristics. The analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each approach, where the single-layer structure with an I controller was faster to reach the setpoint and was efficient to reject disturbances.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(6)
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.