Ensuring Responsible Nanotechnology Innovation

Abstract The challenge of considering the ethical, environmental, economic, social, legal and cultural (E 3 LSC) dimensions of nanotechnology innovation is of enduring and increasing importance for societies worldwide. This is made more pressing due to rising public interest in the realms of AI and quantum technology. Drawing on an interdisciplinary collaboration between nanotechnology and social science researchers, this paper discusses how E 3 LSC dimensions are negotiated in practice and what lessons can be brought forward to develop E 3 LSC considerations as nanotechnology and nanoscience continue to advance. Drawing on sociological data from 34 semi-structured interviews with academic scientists researching nanotechnology in Australia, we discuss the contemporary challenges facing nanotechnology researchers. These included acknowledgement of the complexities of navigating E 3 LSC within the realities of the contemporary university landscape; the increasing turn toward commercialisation in Australia, and the enduring challenges of multidisciplinarity. We discuss how these challenges are complex, but suggest that effective embedding of disciplinary training can contribute to ‘upstreaming’ E 3 LSC considerations for the betterment of nanotechnology innovation and society alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NanoEthics
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-025-00478-9
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring Responsible Nanotechnology Innovation

Katherine Kenny, Alice Motion, Jianni Tien, Stephen T. Bartlett
3 citations
NanoEthics
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
2.58
article

Ensuring Responsible Nanotechnology Innovation

Katherine Kenny, Alice Motion, Jianni Tien, Stephen T. Bartlett
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The challenge of considering the ethical, environmental, economic, social, legal and cultural (E 3 LSC) dimensions of nanotechnology innovation is of enduring and increasing importance for societies worldwide. This is made more pressing due to rising public interest in the realms of AI and quantum technology. Drawing on an interdisciplinary collaboration between nanotechnology and social science researchers, this paper discusses how E 3 LSC dimensions are negotiated in practice and what lessons can be brought forward to develop E 3 LSC considerations as nanotechnology and nanoscience continue to advance. Drawing on sociological data from 34 semi-structured interviews with academic scientists researching nanotechnology in Australia, we discuss the contemporary challenges facing nanotechnology researchers. These included acknowledgement of the complexities of navigating E 3 LSC within the realities of the contemporary university landscape; the increasing turn toward commercialisation in Australia, and the enduring challenges of multidisciplinarity. We discuss how these challenges are complex, but suggest that effective embedding of disciplinary training can contribute to ‘upstreaming’ E 3 LSC considerations for the betterment of nanotechnology innovation and society alike.

NanoEthicsVol. 19(2)
The University of Sydney (AU)
University of Sydney, Nano Institute, University of Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
2.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.