<i>Bitcoin and the anthropology‐economics divide</i>

This guest editorial argues for renewed intellectual engagement between anthropology and economics, two disciplines that became estranged during 20th‐century debates over human motivation and cooperation. With anthropologists largely rejecting economic theories following the formalist‐substantivist controversy, this ‘disciplinary divorce’ has impoverished anthropological analysis by limiting available theoretical tools. Contemporary anthropologists often mischaracterize economic arguments – particularly regarding barter theory – while remaining unaware of insights from heterodox economic schools that increasingly draw on anthropological methods and findings. Both disciplines share a fundamental concern with developing a general theory of value, making collaboration essential. The institution of money serves as an especially productive site for such interdisciplinary dialogue, functioning simultaneously as a social institution and technology that addresses the coordination problems inherent in complex societies. Bitcoin's emergence as the first natively digital, nonstate medium of exchange presents an unprecedented opportunity to examine how monetary institutions evolve and impact social relationships. By moving beyond disciplinary boundaries and engaging seriously with economic theory, anthropologists can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of value across human societies while advancing both fields’ shared intellectual project of explaining social organization and cultural change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropology Today
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.70010
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bitcoin and the anthropology‐economics divide

Natalie Smolenski
Anthropology Today
Art History and Market Analysis
article

Bitcoin and the anthropology‐economics divide

Natalie Smolenski
article en

Abstract

This guest editorial argues for renewed intellectual engagement between anthropology and economics, two disciplines that became estranged during 20th‐century debates over human motivation and cooperation. With anthropologists largely rejecting economic theories following the formalist‐substantivist controversy, this ‘disciplinary divorce’ has impoverished anthropological analysis by limiting available theoretical tools. Contemporary anthropologists often mischaracterize economic arguments – particularly regarding barter theory – while remaining unaware of insights from heterodox economic schools that increasingly draw on anthropological methods and findings. Both disciplines share a fundamental concern with developing a general theory of value, making collaboration essential. The institution of money serves as an especially productive site for such interdisciplinary dialogue, functioning simultaneously as a social institution and technology that addresses the coordination problems inherent in complex societies. Bitcoin's emergence as the first natively digital, nonstate medium of exchange presents an unprecedented opportunity to examine how monetary institutions evolve and impact social relationships. By moving beyond disciplinary boundaries and engaging seriously with economic theory, anthropologists can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of value across human societies while advancing both fields’ shared intellectual project of explaining social organization and cultural change.

Anthropology TodayVol. 41(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Art History and Market Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.