Direct-to-Consumer Insurance Marketing:A Systematic Review of Legal, Ethical, and Consumer Perspectives

Purpose: This study systematically examines the evolving landscape of Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) insurance marketing with a focus on legal standards, advertising ethics, and consumer outcomes. As digital platforms increasingly replace traditional intermediaries, the research investigates the implications of this transition for regulatory compliance, ethical conduct, and user welfare.Design/Methodology/Approach: Following PRISMA guidelines, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted across databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The review screened 1,400 records, resulting in the final inclusion of 68 peer-reviewed publications from 2004–2024. The study integrates thematic synthesis and meta-analysis to evaluate patterns and effect sizes across empirical findings. Quality appraisal was performed using CASP and JBI checklists to ensure methodological rigor.Findings: The study finds that D2C models enhance efficiency and personalization in insurance distribution but simultaneously introduce ethical and regulatory challenges. Emotional manipulation, lack of disclosure, and algorithmic opacity are widespread in D2C advertising. Jurisdictions with strong regulatory oversight (e.g., EU, India) demonstrate better consumer satisfaction and trust outcomes. Meta-analysis shows a moderate but significant positive correlation between ethical marketing practices and consumer decision confidence.Research Limitations/Implications: The review is restricted to English-language literature and peer-reviewed sources, excluding grey literature. Empirical generalizability is limited due to inconsistent methodologies and limited longitudinal data in reviewed studies. However, the study lays groundwork for future empirical investigations using RCTs, algorithm audits, and cross-country legal evaluations.Practical Implications: Insurance companies must ensure transparency, fairness, and digital literacy support in D2C platforms. Regulators are urged to develop harmonized frameworks for digital consent, advertising standards, and algorithmic accountability. Ethical marketing codes and real-time regulatory oversight (e.g., RegTech) are critical to safeguard consumer rights.Originality/Value: This is one of the first comprehensive SLRs with meta-analytic integration on D2C insurance marketing that spans ethical, legal, and behavioral dimensions. By combining insights from stakeholder theory, technology acceptance, and regulatory frameworks, the study offers a multi-perspective lens to guide academic research, policy formulation, and industry best practices in digital insurance ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64526/iilr.33.3.3
Primary Topic
Business Law and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct-to-Consumer Insurance Marketing:A Systematic Review of Legal, Ethical, and Consumer Perspectives

Chinmaya Kulshrestha, Avinash Kapoor
Business Law and Ethics
article

Direct-to-Consumer Insurance Marketing:A Systematic Review of Legal, Ethical, and Consumer Perspectives

Chinmaya Kulshrestha, Avinash Kapoor
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study systematically examines the evolving landscape of Direct-to-Consumer (D2C) insurance marketing with a focus on legal standards, advertising ethics, and consumer outcomes. As digital platforms increasingly replace traditional intermediaries, the research investigates the implications of this transition for regulatory compliance, ethical conduct, and user welfare.Design/Methodology/Approach: Following PRISMA guidelines, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted across databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The review screened 1,400 records, resulting in the final inclusion of 68 peer-reviewed publications from 2004–2024. The study integrates thematic synthesis and meta-analysis to evaluate patterns and effect sizes across empirical findings. Quality appraisal was performed using CASP and JBI checklists to ensure methodological rigor.Findings: The study finds that D2C models enhance efficiency and personalization in insurance distribution but simultaneously introduce ethical and regulatory challenges. Emotional manipulation, lack of disclosure, and algorithmic opacity are widespread in D2C advertising. Jurisdictions with strong regulatory oversight (e.g., EU, India) demonstrate better consumer satisfaction and trust outcomes. Meta-analysis shows a moderate but significant positive correlation between ethical marketing practices and consumer decision confidence.Research Limitations/Implications: The review is restricted to English-language literature and peer-reviewed sources, excluding grey literature. Empirical generalizability is limited due to inconsistent methodologies and limited longitudinal data in reviewed studies. However, the study lays groundwork for future empirical investigations using RCTs, algorithm audits, and cross-country legal evaluations.Practical Implications: Insurance companies must ensure transparency, fairness, and digital literacy support in D2C platforms. Regulators are urged to develop harmonized frameworks for digital consent, advertising standards, and algorithmic accountability. Ethical marketing codes and real-time regulatory oversight (e.g., RegTech) are critical to safeguard consumer rights.Originality/Value: This is one of the first comprehensive SLRs with meta-analytic integration on D2C insurance marketing that spans ethical, legal, and behavioral dimensions. By combining insights from stakeholder theory, technology acceptance, and regulatory frameworks, the study offers a multi-perspective lens to guide academic research, policy formulation, and industry best practices in digital insurance ecosystems.

Vol. 33(3)
Management Development Institute (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Business Law and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.