Comparison of Standard versus Accelerated Ponseti Protocol for Club Foot

Clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a common congenital musculoskeletal deformity, and the Ponseti method is the current gold standard for its management. While the standard Ponseti protocol is well-established, accelerated protocols have been introduced to potentially reduce treatment time without compromising outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the standard Ponseti protocol versus the accelerated Ponseti protocol in the management of clubfoot. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from April 2024 to February 2025. A total of 144 patients with clubfoot were enrolled and randomly allocated into Group A (standard Ponseti protocol) and Group B (accelerated Ponseti protocol). The Ponseti method was applied as per group allocation, and treatment effectiveness was evaluated using the Pirani scoring system at baseline and at six months follow-up. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 144 patients, the median age was 4.00 (IQR: 1.00–8.00) months, with 92 (63.89%) males and 52 (36.11%) females. The median pre-treatment Pirani score was 5.00 (IQR: 4.00–6.00). At six months, the median post-treatment Pirani score was 1.00 (IQR: 0.00–4.00) in both groups; however, the difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.005). Treatment effectiveness at six months was higher in the accelerated protocol group (83.33%) compared to the standard protocol group (56.94%) (p=0.001). Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti protocol demonstrated superior effectiveness compared to the standard protocol for the management of clubfoot, potentially offering faster correction without compromising treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1888
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Standard versus Accelerated Ponseti Protocol for Club Foot

Suzanne Amin, Israr Ahmad, Nida Maryam, Kashif Ali Naz et al.
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Comparison of Standard versus Accelerated Ponseti Protocol for Club Foot

Suzanne Amin, Israr Ahmad, Nida Maryam, Kashif Ali Naz, Qamar Arif, Hina Majeed
article en

Abstract

Clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) is a common congenital musculoskeletal deformity, and the Ponseti method is the current gold standard for its management. While the standard Ponseti protocol is well-established, accelerated protocols have been introduced to potentially reduce treatment time without compromising outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the standard Ponseti protocol versus the accelerated Ponseti protocol in the management of clubfoot. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from April 2024 to February 2025. A total of 144 patients with clubfoot were enrolled and randomly allocated into Group A (standard Ponseti protocol) and Group B (accelerated Ponseti protocol). The Ponseti method was applied as per group allocation, and treatment effectiveness was evaluated using the Pirani scoring system at baseline and at six months follow-up. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 144 patients, the median age was 4.00 (IQR: 1.00–8.00) months, with 92 (63.89%) males and 52 (36.11%) females. The median pre-treatment Pirani score was 5.00 (IQR: 4.00–6.00). At six months, the median post-treatment Pirani score was 1.00 (IQR: 0.00–4.00) in both groups; however, the difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.005). Treatment effectiveness at six months was higher in the accelerated protocol group (83.33%) compared to the standard protocol group (56.94%) (p=0.001). Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti protocol demonstrated superior effectiveness compared to the standard protocol for the management of clubfoot, potentially offering faster correction without compromising treatment outcomes.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(6)
Combined Military Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.