Route choice to inform navigation system design and accessibility analysis for older pedestrians: a scoping review
Routing systems can support older adults by helping them overcome barriers to walking, promoting independence and well-being. The paths generated by these systems also inform urban accessibility metrics, such as those used in 15-min-city planning. Yet current systems rarely reflect the preferences or constraints of older pedestrians. Empirical studies of route choice can help close this gap by revealing how people trade off different route attributes in real settings. We conducted a scoping review, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, of empirical studies analyzing pedestrian route choice among adults. The goal was to identify findings that could inform the design of more age-inclusive routing tools. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, eight of which focused exclusively on older adults. Despite varied contexts, three consistent themes emerged: (i) sidewalk quality and manageable gradients; (ii) aesthetic and sensory comfort, including greenery, low noise, and good lighting; and (iii) access to benches, transit, and everyday amenities. However, most studies relied on qualitative methods, limiting direct integration into routing algorithms. Future work should prioritize hybrid qualitative-quantitative designs, large-scale sampling of routes, and fine-grained mapping of micro-barriers. Analyses should account for age, gender, and functional ability, and consider circular leisure walks as a distinct travel pattern. These directions can enhance the usability and equity of routing systems and urban planning frameworks. • Calibrated routing is vital for inclusive navigation and realistic accessibility scores. • This scoping review assesses whether current evidence can support routing design. • Only 11 studies met criteria; most are small-scale and qualitative in nature. • Safety, pavement quality and resting places can determine walk feasibility. • We recommend hybrid, scalable studies to build age-responsive routing systems.
Authors
- Fatma Armağan Teke Lloyd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5439-439X)
- Jan Amcoff (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-0536)
- Marina Toger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-6971)
- Umut Türk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8440-7048)
- Kathrin Foshag (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-2563)
- Nir Fulman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-2641)
- Yulia Grinblat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4547-7569)
- Sven Lautenbach (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9996)
- Alexander Zipf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-9838)
- Johanna Jokinen
- Johannes Huber
Institutions
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Heidelberg University of Education (DE)
- Heidelberg University (US)
- Abdullah Gül University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Transport & Health
- Published
- 2025-08-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2025.102151
- Primary Topic
- Urban Transport and Accessibility
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00