Metal foam flow field in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Numerical and experimental evaluation

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of metal foam flow field application within polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and compares it with conventional serpentine channels from both computational fluid dynamics simulation and experimental viewpoints. The experiments are designed to investigate the effects of material, area density, compression ratio, and final thickness of metal foam. Additionally, the influence of housing plate material and relative humidity (RH) is tested here. The results reveal that at RH = 75%–100%, the best flow field design is nickel foam with a compression ratio of 70%, a final thickness of 0.5 mm, and an SS-304 housing plate, which delivers a great limiting current density. In comparison with the serpentine channel case, the PEFC with this foam flow field shows a 10% improvement in maximum power density (901 vs 989 mW cm−2) and a 45% improvement in limiting current density (2140 vs 3110 mA cm−2). While at RH = 30%, the same foam flow field with a final thickness of 1 mm is a superior option. The experiments also indicate that maximum power density increases by 23% (from 684 to 841 mW cm−2) as the compression ratio rises from 0% to 70% while reducing final thickness from 1 to 0.5 mm causes a 5.8% enhancement in (from 935 to 989 mW cm−2) cell performance. Simulation results reveal that metal foam is more effective in evenly distributing reactants, resulting in an average oxygen mass fraction at the cathode catalyst layer that is 38% higher than the serpentine channel case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0281573
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metal foam flow field in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Numerical and experimental evaluation

Robert Steinberger‐Wilckens, Ahmad El-Kharouf, Hadi Heidary
3 citations
Physics of Fluids
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
2.19
article

Metal foam flow field in polymer electrolyte fuel cells: Numerical and experimental evaluation

Robert Steinberger‐Wilckens, Ahmad El-Kharouf, Hadi Heidary
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of metal foam flow field application within polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and compares it with conventional serpentine channels from both computational fluid dynamics simulation and experimental viewpoints. The experiments are designed to investigate the effects of material, area density, compression ratio, and final thickness of metal foam. Additionally, the influence of housing plate material and relative humidity (RH) is tested here. The results reveal that at RH = 75%–100%, the best flow field design is nickel foam with a compression ratio of 70%, a final thickness of 0.5 mm, and an SS-304 housing plate, which delivers a great limiting current density. In comparison with the serpentine channel case, the PEFC with this foam flow field shows a 10% improvement in maximum power density (901 vs 989 mW cm−2) and a 45% improvement in limiting current density (2140 vs 3110 mA cm−2). While at RH = 30%, the same foam flow field with a final thickness of 1 mm is a superior option. The experiments also indicate that maximum power density increases by 23% (from 684 to 841 mW cm−2) as the compression ratio rises from 0% to 70% while reducing final thickness from 1 to 0.5 mm causes a 5.8% enhancement in (from 935 to 989 mW cm−2) cell performance. Simulation results reveal that metal foam is more effective in evenly distributing reactants, resulting in an average oxygen mass fraction at the cathode catalyst layer that is 38% higher than the serpentine channel case.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(8)
Jahrom University (IR), University of Birmingham (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.