Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning: Current Thinking and Use of Technological Aids

Purpose: To present our approach to zygomatic osteotomy and repositioning using technological aids: virtual surgical planning, custom guides, and implants. Background: The zygomatic complex is highly 3-dimensional, establishing cheek prominence, facial width, and orbital morphology. Functionally, the zygoma supports soft tissues and is vital to mastication. The zygoma may require reconstruction after a variety of congenital or acquired conditions; however, Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is a complex operation with many technical considerations. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility, while permitting utilization of custom-designed guides and implants. There remains a paucity of literature on ZyOaR and its unique challenges. Methods: This case series includes all patients older than 18 years old undergoing ZyOaR with VSP between 2010 and 2024. Demographics and clinical etiology were noted. Outcomes included fidelity to preoperative plan, facial symmetry, mastication defects, and globe malposition. Results: Eight patients age 18 to 60 years old (mean = 38) met inclusion criteria. Three patients had congenital deformities, and 5 were post-traumatic. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean = 17 months). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No patient had visual changes at latest follow-up. Preoperative VSP plans were compared to postoperative CT scans, showing a high degree of fidelity. All patients underwent secondary reconstructive and/or soft tissue procedures to achieve final results. Conclusions: Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is inherently difficult, and there is a current gap in the literature on its unique technical challenges. We present 8 cases of ZyOaR using VSP for patients with a range of disease etiologies. The procedures were well tolerated and maintained high surgical fidelity. In our experience, keys to optimize ZyOaR include comprehensive analysis of regional bony and soft tissue anatomy, virtual planning with production and use of surgical transfer guides, and custom 3D printed patient-specific implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016251352171
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning: Current Thinking and Use of Technological Aids

Evan Bradshaw, Hung Le, Raymond Harshbarger, Rachel Daum et al.
FACE
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning: Current Thinking and Use of Technological Aids

Evan Bradshaw, Hung Le, Raymond Harshbarger, Rachel Daum, Cole Holan, Amanda C. Seymour
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To present our approach to zygomatic osteotomy and repositioning using technological aids: virtual surgical planning, custom guides, and implants. Background: The zygomatic complex is highly 3-dimensional, establishing cheek prominence, facial width, and orbital morphology. Functionally, the zygoma supports soft tissues and is vital to mastication. The zygoma may require reconstruction after a variety of congenital or acquired conditions; however, Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is a complex operation with many technical considerations. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility, while permitting utilization of custom-designed guides and implants. There remains a paucity of literature on ZyOaR and its unique challenges. Methods: This case series includes all patients older than 18 years old undergoing ZyOaR with VSP between 2010 and 2024. Demographics and clinical etiology were noted. Outcomes included fidelity to preoperative plan, facial symmetry, mastication defects, and globe malposition. Results: Eight patients age 18 to 60 years old (mean = 38) met inclusion criteria. Three patients had congenital deformities, and 5 were post-traumatic. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean = 17 months). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No patient had visual changes at latest follow-up. Preoperative VSP plans were compared to postoperative CT scans, showing a high degree of fidelity. All patients underwent secondary reconstructive and/or soft tissue procedures to achieve final results. Conclusions: Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is inherently difficult, and there is a current gap in the literature on its unique technical challenges. We present 8 cases of ZyOaR using VSP for patients with a range of disease etiologies. The procedures were well tolerated and maintained high surgical fidelity. In our experience, keys to optimize ZyOaR include comprehensive analysis of regional bony and soft tissue anatomy, virtual planning with production and use of surgical transfer guides, and custom 3D printed patient-specific implants.

FACEVol. 6(3)
Texas Tech University (US), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Utah (US), Seton Medical Center (US), Seton Medical Center Austin (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.