Strategies for developing user experience evaluation instruments

Currently, there are several strategies for creating user experience evaluation instruments for specific domains. Some of these approaches focus on introducing new approaches to develop and expand the field of user experience evaluations. We analyzed various studies related to the development of user experience instruments to identify the steps and characteristics of these procedures. We identified four types of procedures: apply an agile method, create instruments based on literature review, mix existing instruments, and modify existing instruments. However, a small number of these studies explicitly described the step-by-step methodology applied or the approach used; and even fewer provided a validation process for the proposed instrument. Therefore, there is an interesting area of ​​research to formalize the process of creating new user experience evaluation instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.091
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for developing user experience evaluation instruments

Daniela Quiñones, Luis Rojas, José Osega
Procedia Computer Science
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Strategies for developing user experience evaluation instruments

Daniela Quiñones, Luis Rojas, José Osega
article en

Abstract

Currently, there are several strategies for creating user experience evaluation instruments for specific domains. Some of these approaches focus on introducing new approaches to develop and expand the field of user experience evaluations. We analyzed various studies related to the development of user experience instruments to identify the steps and characteristics of these procedures. We identified four types of procedures: apply an agile method, create instruments based on literature review, mix existing instruments, and modify existing instruments. However, a small number of these studies explicitly described the step-by-step methodology applied or the approach used; and even fewer provided a validation process for the proposed instrument. Therefore, there is an interesting area of ​​research to formalize the process of creating new user experience evaluation instruments.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 263
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL)
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strategies for developing user experience evaluation instruments — Daniela Quiñones, Luis Rojas, et al. · Procedia Computer Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS