Issue congruence between candidates' Twitter communication and constituencies in an MMES: Migration as an exemplary case

Abstract How responsive are individual politicians to their constituents’ issue priorities? While parties compete nationally, candidates must navigate varying local issue salience. We investigate whether candidates adjust their emphasis on migration to district-level priorities in Germany’s mixed-member electoral system. Using survey data on voter issue salience and over a million candidate tweets from the 2017 Bundestag election, we apply supervised classification to assess issue congruence. Our findings reveal that MPs elected by their district are significantly more responsive to their constituents’ migration concerns than candidates elected via party lists. However, overall, candidates do not systematically align their communication with district-level preferences, suggesting that party strategies and electoral incentives shape responsiveness. These results underscore the role of electoral mandates in structuring political representation, highlighting the varying degrees of accountability in mixed-member systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parliamentary Affairs
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaf033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Issue congruence between candidates' Twitter communication and constituencies in an MMES: Migration as an exemplary case

L. Constantin Wurthmann, Marius Sältzer
1 citations
Parliamentary Affairs
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
article

Issue congruence between candidates' Twitter communication and constituencies in an MMES: Migration as an exemplary case

L. Constantin Wurthmann, Marius Sältzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract How responsive are individual politicians to their constituents’ issue priorities? While parties compete nationally, candidates must navigate varying local issue salience. We investigate whether candidates adjust their emphasis on migration to district-level priorities in Germany’s mixed-member electoral system. Using survey data on voter issue salience and over a million candidate tweets from the 2017 Bundestag election, we apply supervised classification to assess issue congruence. Our findings reveal that MPs elected by their district are significantly more responsive to their constituents’ migration concerns than candidates elected via party lists. However, overall, candidates do not systematically align their communication with district-level preferences, suggesting that party strategies and electoral incentives shape responsiveness. These results underscore the role of electoral mandates in structuring political representation, highlighting the varying degrees of accountability in mixed-member systems.

Parliamentary Affairs
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University of Mannheim (DE), Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.