Comprehensive life cycle assessment of selected seasonal thermal energy storage systems

The utilization of seasonal thermal energy storage (sTES) systems is essential for balancing fluctuations between demand and surplus of heating/cooling in modern energy systems and to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions from space heating. However, large storage volumes are required to store the heat over extended periods leading to a high demand for construction materials and processes. Yet, no comprehensive environmental evaluation compares sTES technologies across their life cycle phases. This study employs life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts of three different type of sTES: a tank thermal energy storage (TTES), a water-gravel thermal energy storage (WGTES), and a pit thermal energy storage (PTES). Aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) systems are also included as reference for evaluating the results. Greenhouse gas emissions from the construction phase vary between 1.4 (PTES) and 29.4 g CO 2-eq /kWh th (WGTES), depending on the type of installation, storage size, and construction materials. Utilizing water as a filling material and large storage volumes with reduced surface-to-volume ratios enhance environmental performance. Controversely, materials such as concrete, steel, foam glass gravel, and related transport processes contribute significantly to the environmental impact. These should be replaced wherever possible by sustainable alternatives without compromising storage capacity and efficiency. • Life cycle assessment of three seasonal thermal energy storage systems. • Evaluation based on three environmental impact assessment categories. • Construction processes with the highest environmental impacts are identified. • Results reveal recommendations for material selections and improved storage design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable Energy
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.124232
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive life cycle assessment of selected seasonal thermal energy storage systems

Peter Bayer, Christoph Bott, Kathrin Menberg, Jenny Weise
4 citations
Renewable Energy
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
1.45
article

Comprehensive life cycle assessment of selected seasonal thermal energy storage systems

Peter Bayer, Christoph Bott, Kathrin Menberg, Jenny Weise
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The utilization of seasonal thermal energy storage (sTES) systems is essential for balancing fluctuations between demand and surplus of heating/cooling in modern energy systems and to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions from space heating. However, large storage volumes are required to store the heat over extended periods leading to a high demand for construction materials and processes. Yet, no comprehensive environmental evaluation compares sTES technologies across their life cycle phases. This study employs life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts of three different type of sTES: a tank thermal energy storage (TTES), a water-gravel thermal energy storage (WGTES), and a pit thermal energy storage (PTES). Aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) systems are also included as reference for evaluating the results. Greenhouse gas emissions from the construction phase vary between 1.4 (PTES) and 29.4 g CO 2-eq /kWh th (WGTES), depending on the type of installation, storage size, and construction materials. Utilizing water as a filling material and large storage volumes with reduced surface-to-volume ratios enhance environmental performance. Controversely, materials such as concrete, steel, foam glass gravel, and related transport processes contribute significantly to the environmental impact. These should be replaced wherever possible by sustainable alternatives without compromising storage capacity and efficiency. • Life cycle assessment of three seasonal thermal energy storage systems. • Evaluation based on three environmental impact assessment categories. • Construction processes with the highest environmental impacts are identified. • Results reveal recommendations for material selections and improved storage design.

Renewable EnergyVol. 256
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.