Evaluation of Slump Flow and Slump Flow Velocity Test Method for Deep Foundation Concrete

Specifications for concrete in deep foundation have evolved toward increase in durability and strength requirements pushing to lower water / cement ratio. This evolution leads to mix design with rheological properties governed by admixture system. At the same time, concrete mix design optimized to reduce carbon footprint are following pattern. Consistency test methods are not always adapted to characterize the fluid consistency of concrete mixes that are not designed to be true self levelling concrete. EFFC/DFI Guide to tremie concrete recommends slump flow in the range of 400 to 550 mm and slump flow velocity as most suitable test method to characterize concrete workability. NF EN 12350-8 for Europe and ASTM C1611 in North America do not give precision and bias for this range of consistence. Slump flow velocity has no standard method to help in specifying on projects. Authors find that there is a standard gap in using slump flow test method in the recommended range of the EFFC/DFI guide with limitation expressed in the EN 206 concrete standard. This paper presents results of different method to evaluate slump flow with repeatability testing and a comparison between slump flow velocity and viscosity measured with invert Abrams cone as per NF P18-469 standard and gives background technical data to back up the use of the slump flow method for concrete used in deep foundation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37308/dfieffc251240517
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Slump Flow and Slump Flow Velocity Test Method for Deep Foundation Concrete

Christophe Justino
Dam Engineering and Safety
article

Evaluation of Slump Flow and Slump Flow Velocity Test Method for Deep Foundation Concrete

Christophe Justino
article en

Abstract

Specifications for concrete in deep foundation have evolved toward increase in durability and strength requirements pushing to lower water / cement ratio. This evolution leads to mix design with rheological properties governed by admixture system. At the same time, concrete mix design optimized to reduce carbon footprint are following pattern. Consistency test methods are not always adapted to characterize the fluid consistency of concrete mixes that are not designed to be true self levelling concrete. EFFC/DFI Guide to tremie concrete recommends slump flow in the range of 400 to 550 mm and slump flow velocity as most suitable test method to characterize concrete workability. NF EN 12350-8 for Europe and ASTM C1611 in North America do not give precision and bias for this range of consistence. Slump flow velocity has no standard method to help in specifying on projects. Authors find that there is a standard gap in using slump flow test method in the recommended range of the EFFC/DFI guide with limitation expressed in the EN 206 concrete standard. This paper presents results of different method to evaluate slump flow with repeatability testing and a comparison between slump flow velocity and viscosity measured with invert Abrams cone as per NF P18-469 standard and gives background technical data to back up the use of the slump flow method for concrete used in deep foundation.

Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Dam Engineering and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.