Implementing Large Quantum Boltzmann Machines as Generative AI Models for Dataset Balancing
This study explores the implementation of large Quantum Restricted Boltzmann Machines (QRBMs), a key advancement in Quantum Machine Learning (QML), as generative models on D-Wave’s Pegasus quantum hardware to address dataset imbalance in Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS). By leveraging Pegasus’s enhanced connectivity and computational capabilities, a QRBM with 120 visible and 120 hidden units was successfully embedded, surpassing the limitations of default embedding tools. The QRBM synthesized over 1.6 million attack samples, achieving a balanced dataset of over 4.2 million records. Comparative evaluations with traditional balancing methods, such as SMOTE and RandomOversampler, revealed that QRBMs produced higher-quality synthetic samples, significantly improving detection rates, precision, recall, and F<inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1</inf> score across diverse classifiers. The study underscores the scalability and efficiency of QRBMs, completing balancing tasks in milliseconds. These findings highlight the transformative potential of QML and QRBMs as next-generation tools in data preprocessing, offering robust solutions for complex computational challenges in modern information systems.
Authors
- Arati Sahoo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3143-0344)
- Thomas Groß (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7766-2454)
- Salvatore Sinno (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9177-5161)
- Markus Bertl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-8095)
- Nicholas Chancellor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1293-0761)
- Bhavika Bhalgamiya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8586-4531)
Institutions
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Unisys (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-03-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ngise64126.2025.11085158
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.55