Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line

Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular system diseases. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure devices are now widely for the measurement of blood pressure patients at home and even by the doctors in emergency room in Iraq due to their ease of use. However, the accuracy of these devices had been a matter of debate. Aim of the study: Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the automated wrist and upper arm devices in blood pressure measurement. Methods: The study was a cross sectional study involved 75 patients who were undergoing cardiac catheterization. Blood pressure was measured using two types of automated devices, Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices. Their readings were compared simultaneously with the readings of an intra-arterial catheter to assess their accuracy. Results: The automated upper arm and wrist devices measured a higher value of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures than those measured by intra-arterial catheter with mean of differences of 6.11 mmHg, 6.79 mmHg and 6.57 mmHg respectively, regarding the upper arm device. The mean of differences of the readings of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures measured by wrist device were 11.32 mmHg, 18.30 mmHg and 15.98 mmHg, respectively. Both devices exhibited good reproducibility. Conclusion: Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices overestimate blood pressure. They are inaccurate and should not be relied upon for critically ill patients and in the emergency room.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kufa Medical journal
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36330/kmj.v21.i1.18997
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line

Ahmed Abdulwahid
Kufa Medical journal
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line

Ahmed Abdulwahid
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular system diseases. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure devices are now widely for the measurement of blood pressure patients at home and even by the doctors in emergency room in Iraq due to their ease of use. However, the accuracy of these devices had been a matter of debate. Aim of the study: Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the automated wrist and upper arm devices in blood pressure measurement. Methods: The study was a cross sectional study involved 75 patients who were undergoing cardiac catheterization. Blood pressure was measured using two types of automated devices, Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices. Their readings were compared simultaneously with the readings of an intra-arterial catheter to assess their accuracy. Results: The automated upper arm and wrist devices measured a higher value of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures than those measured by intra-arterial catheter with mean of differences of 6.11 mmHg, 6.79 mmHg and 6.57 mmHg respectively, regarding the upper arm device. The mean of differences of the readings of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures measured by wrist device were 11.32 mmHg, 18.30 mmHg and 15.98 mmHg, respectively. Both devices exhibited good reproducibility. Conclusion: Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices overestimate blood pressure. They are inaccurate and should not be relied upon for critically ill patients and in the emergency room.

Kufa Medical journalVol. 21(1)
University of Basrah (IQ), Iraq University College (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.