The Authority of the Prosecutor in Conducting Investigations into Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 16 of 2004

Corruption in Indonesia remains a persistent problem, undermining the government system, economy, and threatening social stability. This study aims to analyze the authority of prosecutors in conducting investigations into corruption crimes based on Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The research questions in this study include: 1) How is the authority of the prosecutor's office regulated in investigating corruption crimes under Law Number 16 of 2004; 2) What is the mechanism for investigations conducted by prosecutors; and 3) What obstacles are faced by prosecutors in conducting investigations based on this law. This research uses normative and empirical legal methods. To address these issues, an empirical juridical type of research is employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews and the statute approach. The results show that Law Number 16 of 2004 provides a strong legal foundation for prosecutors to investigate corruption crimes. The authority is further regulated under Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. This represents a significant challenge for the prosecutor's office and other law enforcement agencies to address. The role of prosecutors is specified in Article 1 point 1 of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, and their duties and functions as investigators of corruption crimes are aligned with the provisions of Article 284 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Article 17 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983. The existence of various regulations granting investigative authority to other institutions also poses obstacles, leading to overlapping jurisdictions and differing perceptions in carrying out the investigative process. These issues form significant challenges to the authority of prosecutors as investigators of corruption crimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi.
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69989/0t37j034
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Authority of the Prosecutor in Conducting Investigations into Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 16 of 2004

Engrina Fauzi, Elwidarifa Marwenny, Reyza Darfebryanto
Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi.
Legal Studies and Policies
article

The Authority of the Prosecutor in Conducting Investigations into Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 16 of 2004

Engrina Fauzi, Elwidarifa Marwenny, Reyza Darfebryanto
article en

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia remains a persistent problem, undermining the government system, economy, and threatening social stability. This study aims to analyze the authority of prosecutors in conducting investigations into corruption crimes based on Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The research questions in this study include: 1) How is the authority of the prosecutor's office regulated in investigating corruption crimes under Law Number 16 of 2004; 2) What is the mechanism for investigations conducted by prosecutors; and 3) What obstacles are faced by prosecutors in conducting investigations based on this law. This research uses normative and empirical legal methods. To address these issues, an empirical juridical type of research is employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews and the statute approach. The results show that Law Number 16 of 2004 provides a strong legal foundation for prosecutors to investigate corruption crimes. The authority is further regulated under Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crimes, as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001. This represents a significant challenge for the prosecutor's office and other law enforcement agencies to address. The role of prosecutors is specified in Article 1 point 1 of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, and their duties and functions as investigators of corruption crimes are aligned with the provisions of Article 284 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and Article 17 of Government Regulation Number 27 of 1983. The existence of various regulations granting investigative authority to other institutions also poses obstacles, leading to overlapping jurisdictions and differing perceptions in carrying out the investigative process. These issues form significant challenges to the authority of prosecutors as investigators of corruption crimes.

Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi.Vol. 5(1)
Universitas Dharmas Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Authority of the Prosecutor in Conducting Investigations into Corruption Crimes According to Law Number 16 of 2004 — Engrina Fauzi, Elwidarifa Marwenny, et al. · Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS