The Role of Action in Rational Knowledge According to Mulla Sadra and Qurchaghai Khan

This study examines the role of action and its impact on the rational philosophical knowledge of ʿAli Quli ibn Qurchaghai Khan and Mulla Sadra. The primary objective of this study is to analyze the epistemological elements of each of these philosophers and to explore their differences and similarities in explaining the role of action in cognitive processes. According to Mulla Sadra, knowledge is attained progressively through three levels: sensory, imaginal, and rational, achieved through the substantial motion of the human soul. He emphasizes the role of action in the abstraction of the intellect and its influence on acquiring knowledge. In contrast, Qurchaghai Khan considers knowledge as a form of direct and intrinsic cognition, obtained through the light of reason and connection with the imaginal realm. This study demonstrates that while both philosophers emphasize the gradation of knowledge, fundamental differences exist in their explanations of the source and process of cognition. The conclusion of this study clarifies the similarities and differences in the influence of action on the epistemological discussions of these two thinkers in the context of rational epistemology and its impact on our understanding of human intellectual and moral perfection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Islamic Knowledge and Insight
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61838/iki.103
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Action in Rational Knowledge According to Mulla Sadra and Qurchaghai Khan

Farshad Moradi, mohsen fahim, Alireza Fahim
Islamic Knowledge and Insight
Education and Islamic Studies
article

The Role of Action in Rational Knowledge According to Mulla Sadra and Qurchaghai Khan

Farshad Moradi, mohsen fahim, Alireza Fahim
article en

Abstract

This study examines the role of action and its impact on the rational philosophical knowledge of ʿAli Quli ibn Qurchaghai Khan and Mulla Sadra. The primary objective of this study is to analyze the epistemological elements of each of these philosophers and to explore their differences and similarities in explaining the role of action in cognitive processes. According to Mulla Sadra, knowledge is attained progressively through three levels: sensory, imaginal, and rational, achieved through the substantial motion of the human soul. He emphasizes the role of action in the abstraction of the intellect and its influence on acquiring knowledge. In contrast, Qurchaghai Khan considers knowledge as a form of direct and intrinsic cognition, obtained through the light of reason and connection with the imaginal realm. This study demonstrates that while both philosophers emphasize the gradation of knowledge, fundamental differences exist in their explanations of the source and process of cognition. The conclusion of this study clarifies the similarities and differences in the influence of action on the epistemological discussions of these two thinkers in the context of rational epistemology and its impact on our understanding of human intellectual and moral perfection.

Islamic Knowledge and InsightVol. 3(1)
Hellenic Petroleum (Greece) (GR), Alpha Genesis (United States) (US), Spectrum Scientific (United States) (US), International Society of Automation (US), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.