A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet leads to a more favorable nutrient profile than low FODMAP in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. A randomized clinical trial

A diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) and a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) both alleviate symptoms in IBS. Our hypothesis was that restrictive diets may preserve good nutritional supply. The aims of the study were to compare nutritional intake between SSRD and low FODMAP, and correlations between changes in nutrient intake, weight, and symptoms. This open, non-inferiority trial included patients with IBS according to Rome IV for a 4-week dietary intervention. Patients completed a 3-day food diary, study questionnaire, Rome IV questionnaire, IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), and visual analog scale for IBS (VAS-IBS) at baseline, after 4 weeks of either SSRD or low FODMAP, and at a 6-month follow-up. Daily intake of nutrients was calculated. In total, 155 patients (84 % women), 42 (32–55) years, weight 69.2 (63.0–82.9) kg, were included; 77 randomized to SSRD and 78 to low FODMAP diet. After 4 weeks, both SSRD and low FODMAP reduced symptoms, weight, and intake of calories, carbohydrates, sucrose, and monosaccharides, while vitamin D and B12 intake were increased. SSRD uniquely reduced added sugar, disaccharides, starch, and sodium chloride intake, while increasing protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals. In contrast, low FODMAP reduced intakes in fiber and several vitamins and minerals after 4 weeks and follow-up. The reductions of galacto-oligosaccharides and fructan were most pronounced in SSRD (p < 0.001). These findings highlight the SSRD's potential for broader health benefits and a more nutritionally balanced approach with higher nutrient density compared to the low FODMAP diet. Legend to Graphical Abstract : 155 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were randomized to either a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) or a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) with replacement of candies, soda and cereals with vegetables, fruit, dairy products, and egg for 4 weeks. Food diaries completed showed that SSRD increased the nutrient density at the same time as the energy intake was decreased. • A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) increased intake of vitamins and minerals. •A low FODMAP diet reduced intake of fiber, vitamins, and minerals. •The efficiency of symptom relief in IBS is equal between the diets. •The nutrient intake in SSRD is superior to low FODMAP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Nutrition & Metabolism
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hnm.2025.200337
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet leads to a more favorable nutrient profile than low FODMAP in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. A randomized clinical trial

Bodil Ohlsson, Stine Störsrud, Bodil Roth, Therese Liljebo et al.
2 citations
Human Nutrition & Metabolism
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
3.62
article

A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet leads to a more favorable nutrient profile than low FODMAP in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. A randomized clinical trial

Bodil Ohlsson, Stine Störsrud, Bodil Roth, Therese Liljebo, Kristina Cullman, Noor Al-Shiblawi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) and a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) both alleviate symptoms in IBS. Our hypothesis was that restrictive diets may preserve good nutritional supply. The aims of the study were to compare nutritional intake between SSRD and low FODMAP, and correlations between changes in nutrient intake, weight, and symptoms. This open, non-inferiority trial included patients with IBS according to Rome IV for a 4-week dietary intervention. Patients completed a 3-day food diary, study questionnaire, Rome IV questionnaire, IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), and visual analog scale for IBS (VAS-IBS) at baseline, after 4 weeks of either SSRD or low FODMAP, and at a 6-month follow-up. Daily intake of nutrients was calculated. In total, 155 patients (84 % women), 42 (32–55) years, weight 69.2 (63.0–82.9) kg, were included; 77 randomized to SSRD and 78 to low FODMAP diet. After 4 weeks, both SSRD and low FODMAP reduced symptoms, weight, and intake of calories, carbohydrates, sucrose, and monosaccharides, while vitamin D and B12 intake were increased. SSRD uniquely reduced added sugar, disaccharides, starch, and sodium chloride intake, while increasing protein, fat, vitamins, and minerals. In contrast, low FODMAP reduced intakes in fiber and several vitamins and minerals after 4 weeks and follow-up. The reductions of galacto-oligosaccharides and fructan were most pronounced in SSRD (p < 0.001). These findings highlight the SSRD's potential for broader health benefits and a more nutritionally balanced approach with higher nutrient density compared to the low FODMAP diet. Legend to Graphical Abstract : 155 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were randomized to either a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) or a starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) with replacement of candies, soda and cereals with vegetables, fruit, dairy products, and egg for 4 weeks. Food diaries completed showed that SSRD increased the nutrient density at the same time as the energy intake was decreased. • A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) increased intake of vitamins and minerals. •A low FODMAP diet reduced intake of fiber, vitamins, and minerals. •The efficiency of symptom relief in IBS is equal between the diets. •The nutrient intake in SSRD is superior to low FODMAP.

Human Nutrition & MetabolismVol. 42
National Academy of Medicine (US), Lund University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Almi (Sweden) (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
3.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.