Adjoint analysis of PM2.5 and O3 episodes in priority control zones in China

Understanding and mitigating PM<sub>2.5</sub> and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) pollution remains challenging due to the nonlinear atmospheric chemistry and spatially heterogeneous nature of pollutant emissions. Traditional forward modeling approaches suffer from high computational cost and limited diagnostic resolution to precisely attribute emissions sources at fine spatial, temporal, and chemical scales. Adjoint modeling has emerged as an efficient alternative, enabling high-resolution, multi-pollutant source attribution in a single integrated framework; however, its application to simultaneous PM<sub>2.5</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> pollution episodes is limited, particularly in densely populated regions experiencing complex co-pollutant interactions. Here we apply a newly developed multiphase adjoint of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify the emission sensitivities of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations during pollution episodes in major urban agglomerations. Our results indicate that local emissions predominantly drive PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, contributing up to 79 μg m<sup>-3</sup>. In contrast, O<sub>3</sub> episodes are largely initiated by regional transport (3.8-7.3 ppbv), surpassing local emission contributions during episode onset. The sensitivity analyses reveal distinct spatial emission signatures and pollutant-specific influences from critical precursors, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs; up to 15.9 ppbv O<sub>3</sub>, 11.4 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> ; 16.6 ppbv O<sub>3</sub>, 13.8 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>), and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>; up to 8.7 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>). This study demonstrates the diagnostic strength and predictive capabilities of adjoint modeling in unraveling complex source-receptor relationships. By offering detailed, pollutant-specific emission sensitivity information, our approach provides a robust foundation for precision-driven emission control strategies and improved cross-regional policy coordination, substantially advancing air quality management frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2025.100612
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adjoint analysis of PM2.5 and O3 episodes in priority control zones in China

Yongtao Hu, Shu Min Tao, Amir Hakami, Xueyan Wu et al.
5 citations
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
6.50
article

Adjoint analysis of PM2.5 and O3 episodes in priority control zones in China

Yongtao Hu, Shu Min Tao, Amir Hakami, Xueyan Wu, Zhiyu Zheng, Armistead G. Russell, Qiming Liu, Huizhong Shen, Ruixin Zhang, Shunliu Zhao, Yilin Chen, Zhihong Chen, Zelin Mai
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Understanding and mitigating PM<sub>2.5</sub> and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) pollution remains challenging due to the nonlinear atmospheric chemistry and spatially heterogeneous nature of pollutant emissions. Traditional forward modeling approaches suffer from high computational cost and limited diagnostic resolution to precisely attribute emissions sources at fine spatial, temporal, and chemical scales. Adjoint modeling has emerged as an efficient alternative, enabling high-resolution, multi-pollutant source attribution in a single integrated framework; however, its application to simultaneous PM<sub>2.5</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> pollution episodes is limited, particularly in densely populated regions experiencing complex co-pollutant interactions. Here we apply a newly developed multiphase adjoint of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model to quantify the emission sensitivities of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> concentrations during pollution episodes in major urban agglomerations. Our results indicate that local emissions predominantly drive PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, contributing up to 79 μg m<sup>-3</sup>. In contrast, O<sub>3</sub> episodes are largely initiated by regional transport (3.8-7.3 ppbv), surpassing local emission contributions during episode onset. The sensitivity analyses reveal distinct spatial emission signatures and pollutant-specific influences from critical precursors, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs; up to 15.9 ppbv O<sub>3</sub>, 11.4 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>), nitrogen oxides (NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> ; 16.6 ppbv O<sub>3</sub>, 13.8 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>), and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>; up to 8.7 μg m<sup>-3</sup> PM<sub>2.5</sub>). This study demonstrates the diagnostic strength and predictive capabilities of adjoint modeling in unraveling complex source-receptor relationships. By offering detailed, pollutant-specific emission sensitivity information, our approach provides a robust foundation for precision-driven emission control strategies and improved cross-regional policy coordination, substantially advancing air quality management frameworks.

Environmental Science and EcotechnologyVol. 27
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Peking University (CN), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Carleton University (CA), University of Oklahoma (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
6.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.