A Computational Multiple Resource Theory Approach to Modeling Dual-Task Interference in VR: The Roles of Resource Demand, Resource Conflict, Visual Angle Separation, and Task Priority

Understanding the factors that drive dual-task interference—the performance decline when two tasks are performed concurrently—is critical for designing effective interfaces in multitasking environments such as health care and aviation. This study examines the influence of resource conflict, visual angle separation, and task priority on dual-task interference. Data was collected from 39 participants performing a visual tracking task and a digit task in virtual reality (VR). Using Multiple Resource Theory’s (MRT) computational model, an iterative approach was employed to evaluate each factor’s contribution. Incorporating resource conflict improved model fit over a demand-only baseline, and adding a visual penalty to account for angle separation further enhanced prediction accuracy. Task-specific results showed greater interference in the digit task, suggesting that task priority influences susceptibility to interference. Overall, the results highlight the importance of incorporating resource conflict and perceptual factors, such as visual angle separation, into computational models of dual-task interference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251358799
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Computational Multiple Resource Theory Approach to Modeling Dual-Task Interference in VR: The Roles of Resource Demand, Resource Conflict, Visual Angle Separation, and Task Priority

Matthew L. Bolton, Mohamad El Iskandarani, Christopher D. Wickens, Sara L. Riggs
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

A Computational Multiple Resource Theory Approach to Modeling Dual-Task Interference in VR: The Roles of Resource Demand, Resource Conflict, Visual Angle Separation, and Task Priority

Matthew L. Bolton, Mohamad El Iskandarani, Christopher D. Wickens, Sara L. Riggs
article en

Abstract

Understanding the factors that drive dual-task interference—the performance decline when two tasks are performed concurrently—is critical for designing effective interfaces in multitasking environments such as health care and aviation. This study examines the influence of resource conflict, visual angle separation, and task priority on dual-task interference. Data was collected from 39 participants performing a visual tracking task and a digit task in virtual reality (VR). Using Multiple Resource Theory’s (MRT) computational model, an iterative approach was employed to evaluate each factor’s contribution. Incorporating resource conflict improved model fit over a demand-only baseline, and adding a visual penalty to account for angle separation further enhanced prediction accuracy. Task-specific results showed greater interference in the digit task, suggesting that task priority influences susceptibility to interference. Overall, the results highlight the importance of incorporating resource conflict and perceptual factors, such as visual angle separation, into computational models of dual-task interference.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
University of Virginia (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.