Mapping global shipless areas and conflict zones between shipping and large marine vertebrates

The growth of global maritime traffic poses increasing threats to marine biodiversity, including vessel collisions, behavioural disturbances, and pollution. Protecting areas with minimal shipping activity and identifying high-risk conflict zones between biodiversity and vessel traffic is crucial for conservation and mitigation efforts. However, a comprehensive assessment of these threats has yet to be conducted. We present a global analysis of shipless areas and examine the overlap between shipping density and the distribution of marine taxa known to be impacted by vessel activity—namely, cetaceans, sea turtles, pinnipeds, and seabirds. We identify regions where high biodiversity coincides with either low or intense vessel activity, designating them as Priority Preservation Areas and Priority Mitigation Areas, corresponding to low- and high-conflict zones. We also assess the extent to which Marine Protected Areas, Exclusive Economic Zones, and High Seas encompass these zones. Our results show that MPAs currently cover 12.1 % of shipless areas, 15.2 % of PPAs, and 16.2 % of PMAs, while no-take MPAs cover 6.8 % of shipless areas, 9.5 % of PPAs, and 5.6 % of PMAs. Our findings reveal that shipless areas are mainly restricted to polar and remote oceanic regions. PPAs are mostly located at high southern latitudes, while PMAs are concentrated along coasts, particularly in the mid-Pacific, southern Indian Ocean, and South Atlantic. We underscore the need to preserve low-conflict zones and implement targeted mitigation strategies—such as traffic rerouting and speed reductions—in high-conflict areas. Our framework supports global marine conservation goals, including the 30 × 30 biodiversity target. • Identified global shipless areas and high-risk zones for marine biodiversity. • Mapped overlap of vessel traffic with marine species richness. • Defined Priority Preservation and Mitigation Areas for conservation action. • Around 12 % of shipless areas are within Marine Protected Areas. • Our findings support global biodiversity goals, including the 30 × 30 initiative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111431
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping global shipless areas and conflict zones between shipping and large marine vertebrates

Frederico Mestre, David Jacinto, Fernando Ascensão, Jorge Assis et al.
Biological Conservation
Marine animal studies overview
article

Mapping global shipless areas and conflict zones between shipping and large marine vertebrates

Frederico Mestre, David Jacinto, Fernando Ascensão, Jorge Assis, Vinícius A. G. Bastazini, Ana Marçalo, Marcello D’Amico
article en

Abstract

The growth of global maritime traffic poses increasing threats to marine biodiversity, including vessel collisions, behavioural disturbances, and pollution. Protecting areas with minimal shipping activity and identifying high-risk conflict zones between biodiversity and vessel traffic is crucial for conservation and mitigation efforts. However, a comprehensive assessment of these threats has yet to be conducted. We present a global analysis of shipless areas and examine the overlap between shipping density and the distribution of marine taxa known to be impacted by vessel activity—namely, cetaceans, sea turtles, pinnipeds, and seabirds. We identify regions where high biodiversity coincides with either low or intense vessel activity, designating them as Priority Preservation Areas and Priority Mitigation Areas, corresponding to low- and high-conflict zones. We also assess the extent to which Marine Protected Areas, Exclusive Economic Zones, and High Seas encompass these zones. Our results show that MPAs currently cover 12.1 % of shipless areas, 15.2 % of PPAs, and 16.2 % of PMAs, while no-take MPAs cover 6.8 % of shipless areas, 9.5 % of PPAs, and 5.6 % of PMAs. Our findings reveal that shipless areas are mainly restricted to polar and remote oceanic regions. PPAs are mostly located at high southern latitudes, while PMAs are concentrated along coasts, particularly in the mid-Pacific, southern Indian Ocean, and South Atlantic. We underscore the need to preserve low-conflict zones and implement targeted mitigation strategies—such as traffic rerouting and speed reductions—in high-conflict areas. Our framework supports global marine conservation goals, including the 30 × 30 biodiversity target. • Identified global shipless areas and high-risk zones for marine biodiversity. • Mapped overlap of vessel traffic with marine species richness. • Defined Priority Preservation and Mitigation Areas for conservation action. • Around 12 % of shipless areas are within Marine Protected Areas. • Our findings support global biodiversity goals, including the 30 × 30 initiative.

Biological ConservationVol. 311
University of Évora (PT), Nord University (NO), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Sustainability Institute (ZA), University of Algarve (PT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.