Integrated approach for assessing the fire risk of ethanol storage tank: A case study in ethanol manufacturing plant in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand

• Assessing the risk from undesired events by integrating the tools, namely the FTA technique, the AHP method and the ALOHA program, is therefore important because it makes the results more reasonable. • ALOHA can categorize the types of fire and predict the level of threat divided into the red, orange and yellow zones indicating the most to the least severe. • The proposed risk assessment can provide a solid foundation for guiding the future development of various risk assessment approaches. Assessing fire hazards is critical for enhancing safety in ethanol storage facilities, where highly flammable vapors pose serious risks to workers, infrastructure, and surrounding communities. This study presents an integrated risk assessment framework that combines Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) model to evaluate both the probability and severity of potential fire incidents. FTA was employed to identify hazards and critical failure pathways, with process mapping supported by a piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID), while AHP used expert judgment validated through pairwise comparisons to calculate the probabilities of human and technical errors. ALOHA simulated fire scenarios, estimating thermal radiation impact zones and categorizing hazards into red, orange, and yellow zones representing decreasing severity. Results indicated an overall fire probability of 88.10 %, with primary contributors including human error (86.09 %), equipment failure (77.15 %), tank leakage (70.15 %), and pipe leakage (69.80 %). The framework effectively identified high-risk components, predicted affected radii, and informed targeted risk management measures such as enhanced maintenance protocols, workforce training, and safety buffer zone design. Adaptable to other high-risk industrial contexts such as chemical manufacturing, fuel distribution, and hazardous material storage the approach offers a practical decision-support tool for industrial engineers and safety managers, with the potential to reduce accident-related costs, minimize operational downtime, and improve community safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106700
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated approach for assessing the fire risk of ethanol storage tank: A case study in ethanol manufacturing plant in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand

Arroon Ketsakorn, Ratchanee Joomjee
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
article

Integrated approach for assessing the fire risk of ethanol storage tank: A case study in ethanol manufacturing plant in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand

Arroon Ketsakorn, Ratchanee Joomjee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Assessing the risk from undesired events by integrating the tools, namely the FTA technique, the AHP method and the ALOHA program, is therefore important because it makes the results more reasonable. • ALOHA can categorize the types of fire and predict the level of threat divided into the red, orange and yellow zones indicating the most to the least severe. • The proposed risk assessment can provide a solid foundation for guiding the future development of various risk assessment approaches. Assessing fire hazards is critical for enhancing safety in ethanol storage facilities, where highly flammable vapors pose serious risks to workers, infrastructure, and surrounding communities. This study presents an integrated risk assessment framework that combines Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) model to evaluate both the probability and severity of potential fire incidents. FTA was employed to identify hazards and critical failure pathways, with process mapping supported by a piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID), while AHP used expert judgment validated through pairwise comparisons to calculate the probabilities of human and technical errors. ALOHA simulated fire scenarios, estimating thermal radiation impact zones and categorizing hazards into red, orange, and yellow zones representing decreasing severity. Results indicated an overall fire probability of 88.10 %, with primary contributors including human error (86.09 %), equipment failure (77.15 %), tank leakage (70.15 %), and pipe leakage (69.80 %). The framework effectively identified high-risk components, predicted affected radii, and informed targeted risk management measures such as enhanced maintenance protocols, workforce training, and safety buffer zone design. Adaptable to other high-risk industrial contexts such as chemical manufacturing, fuel distribution, and hazardous material storage the approach offers a practical decision-support tool for industrial engineers and safety managers, with the potential to reduce accident-related costs, minimize operational downtime, and improve community safety.

Results in EngineeringVol. 27
Thammasat University (TH), Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University (TH), Ubon Ratchathani University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.