A synthesis of soybean yield response to controlled drainage under varying precipitation patterns in the US Midwest

Controlled drainage (CD) is a valuable management practice for improving water quality and reducing drainage water discharge volume from agricultural fields, but its specific impact on soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity is not well understood. The objectives of this study were to examine the regional effect of CD on soybean grain yield compared to free drainage (FD), investigate factors affecting soybean yield response to CD, and provide guidance for management of CD to optimize soybean yield. This synthesis included 31 site-years of data collected from 11 field sites in six U.S. Midwestern states during 2007–2018 where soybean was planted under FD and CD. On average, there was no statistically significant difference in soybean grain yield between FD (3915 kg ha −1 ) and CD (3900 kg ha −1 ). However, 35 % of the dataset indicated that CD either increased or decreased soybean yield by 4 % or more compared to FD. Additional analysis was conducted on a subset of 11 site-years of data to assess underlying factors (i.e., drainage system design and management, and weather conditions during the growing season) affecting soybean yield response to CD. This analysis revealed that CD successfully alleviated plant stress caused by mild to moderate drought resulting in increased soybean grain yield by 4–8 % in six site-years. In contrast, CD reduced soybean grain yield by 4–9 % in five site-years during wetter growing seasons. Variability in growing season precipitation coupled with management of CD were the key determinants of soybean grain yield response to CD. The timing and length of wet and dry periods influenced the severity of crop stress and yield loss as soybean sensitivity to wet and dry conditions varies for different growth phases. The management of the CD system could either exacerbate or alleviate stresses caused by wet and dry conditions. Based on results of this synthesis, guidelines were developed for managing manually operated CD systems in the U.S. Midwest to optimize soybean yield response to CD by maximizing positive effects during dry periods while limiting negative effects of the practice during wet periods of the growing season. • Nutrient reduction is the main benefit of controlled drainage. • Yield benefits of controlled drainage, on average, are minimal. • Controlled drainage, if managed properly, can maximize positive effects during dry periods. • Controlled drainage, if managed properly, can limit negative effects during wet periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109707
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant responses to water stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A synthesis of soybean yield response to controlled drainage under varying precipitation patterns in the US Midwest

Hossam Moursi, Jeffrey S. Strock, Chad A. Poole, Kelly A. Nelson et al.
1 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Plant responses to water stress
1.75
article

A synthesis of soybean yield response to controlled drainage under varying precipitation patterns in the US Midwest

Hossam Moursi, Jeffrey S. Strock, Chad A. Poole, Kelly A. Nelson, Andry Ranaivoson, Mohamed A. Youssef
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Controlled drainage (CD) is a valuable management practice for improving water quality and reducing drainage water discharge volume from agricultural fields, but its specific impact on soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] productivity is not well understood. The objectives of this study were to examine the regional effect of CD on soybean grain yield compared to free drainage (FD), investigate factors affecting soybean yield response to CD, and provide guidance for management of CD to optimize soybean yield. This synthesis included 31 site-years of data collected from 11 field sites in six U.S. Midwestern states during 2007–2018 where soybean was planted under FD and CD. On average, there was no statistically significant difference in soybean grain yield between FD (3915 kg ha −1 ) and CD (3900 kg ha −1 ). However, 35 % of the dataset indicated that CD either increased or decreased soybean yield by 4 % or more compared to FD. Additional analysis was conducted on a subset of 11 site-years of data to assess underlying factors (i.e., drainage system design and management, and weather conditions during the growing season) affecting soybean yield response to CD. This analysis revealed that CD successfully alleviated plant stress caused by mild to moderate drought resulting in increased soybean grain yield by 4–8 % in six site-years. In contrast, CD reduced soybean grain yield by 4–9 % in five site-years during wetter growing seasons. Variability in growing season precipitation coupled with management of CD were the key determinants of soybean grain yield response to CD. The timing and length of wet and dry periods influenced the severity of crop stress and yield loss as soybean sensitivity to wet and dry conditions varies for different growth phases. The management of the CD system could either exacerbate or alleviate stresses caused by wet and dry conditions. Based on results of this synthesis, guidelines were developed for managing manually operated CD systems in the U.S. Midwest to optimize soybean yield response to CD by maximizing positive effects during dry periods while limiting negative effects of the practice during wet periods of the growing season. • Nutrient reduction is the main benefit of controlled drainage. • Yield benefits of controlled drainage, on average, are minimal. • Controlled drainage, if managed properly, can maximize positive effects during dry periods. • Controlled drainage, if managed properly, can limit negative effects during wet periods.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 318
North Carolina State University (US), University of Minnesota, Waseca (US), University of Missouri (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant responses to water stress
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.