Wavering and Pushing: Languaging Nationality in a High School LGBTQ+-Themed Literature Course

This study focuses on languaging about nationality in an LGBTQ+-themed literature classroom in a queer-friendly high school in the midwestern region of the United States. It was a blend of ethnography and teacher research in which I constructed and analyzed data that included daily field notes, audio and video recordings of class meetings, audio recordings of interviews with students, documents, and artifacts such as teacher materials and student work. For this article, I asked: How did the high school students in these LGBTQ+-themed Literature courses use language, including written language, to conceptualize nationality, in relation to themselves and the United States? To answer this question, I studied the data that showed us grapple with nationality and nationalism in a context that foregrounded LGBTQ+people. I examined the talk and writing of two students, John and Olivia, who used language, including written language, to conceptualize nationality, in very different, even conflicting, but not wholly incompatible ways. Thus, they did so in ways that left room for change, to varying degrees. Through both wavering and pushing, John and Olivia made space for movement, for change. I argue that it was important to engage in conversations that were, at a particular time and place, more contentious, in a context that foregrounded something less contentious. That we must find the places and times where and when we can be and talk and listen with one another, where and when we can waver, ideologically, and push one another and ourselves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377251358194
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wavering and Pushing: Languaging Nationality in a High School LGBTQ+-Themed Literature Course

Mollie V. Blackburn
Literacy Research Theory Method and Practice
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Wavering and Pushing: Languaging Nationality in a High School LGBTQ+-Themed Literature Course

Mollie V. Blackburn
article en

Abstract

This study focuses on languaging about nationality in an LGBTQ+-themed literature classroom in a queer-friendly high school in the midwestern region of the United States. It was a blend of ethnography and teacher research in which I constructed and analyzed data that included daily field notes, audio and video recordings of class meetings, audio recordings of interviews with students, documents, and artifacts such as teacher materials and student work. For this article, I asked: How did the high school students in these LGBTQ+-themed Literature courses use language, including written language, to conceptualize nationality, in relation to themselves and the United States? To answer this question, I studied the data that showed us grapple with nationality and nationalism in a context that foregrounded LGBTQ+people. I examined the talk and writing of two students, John and Olivia, who used language, including written language, to conceptualize nationality, in very different, even conflicting, but not wholly incompatible ways. Thus, they did so in ways that left room for change, to varying degrees. Through both wavering and pushing, John and Olivia made space for movement, for change. I argue that it was important to engage in conversations that were, at a particular time and place, more contentious, in a context that foregrounded something less contentious. That we must find the places and times where and when we can be and talk and listen with one another, where and when we can waver, ideologically, and push one another and ourselves.

Literacy Research Theory Method and PracticeVol. 74(1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Spencer Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.