Connecting park access and use data for equitable environmental planning

To ensure equity in the provisioning of urban green spaces, both how green spaces are distributed (i.e., access) as well as whether residents are utilizing them (i.e., use) needs to be considered simultaneously. Yet, few green space equity studies have considered both access and use together, and the fragmented literature provides only a partial view of each. This disconnection partly lies in challenges in integrating disparate “access” and “use” datasets. Using the Phoenix-Mesa urbanized area in Arizona as a case study, we present the conceptual and data challenges we have encountered when linking park access using the Trust for Public Land dataset with park usage measured from large scale human mobility datasets (SafeGraph, now Advan). We then show how the choices of data integration can affect findings of green space equity in the study area. In this paper, we enumerate the data and analytical issues encountered, illustrate research opportunities that the data integration provides for green space equity analyses, and discuss the implications of our findings for equitable environmental planning and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083251366735
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting park access and use data for equitable environmental planning

Yushim Kim, Michelle Stuhlmacher, Jieun Kim, Jake R. Nelson et al.
1 links
Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Connecting park access and use data for equitable environmental planning

Yushim Kim, Michelle Stuhlmacher, Jieun Kim, Jake R. Nelson, Youngjae Won
article en

Abstract

To ensure equity in the provisioning of urban green spaces, both how green spaces are distributed (i.e., access) as well as whether residents are utilizing them (i.e., use) needs to be considered simultaneously. Yet, few green space equity studies have considered both access and use together, and the fragmented literature provides only a partial view of each. This disconnection partly lies in challenges in integrating disparate “access” and “use” datasets. Using the Phoenix-Mesa urbanized area in Arizona as a case study, we present the conceptual and data challenges we have encountered when linking park access using the Trust for Public Land dataset with park usage measured from large scale human mobility datasets (SafeGraph, now Advan). We then show how the choices of data integration can affect findings of green space equity in the study area. In this paper, we enumerate the data and analytical issues encountered, illustrate research opportunities that the data integration provides for green space equity analyses, and discuss the implications of our findings for equitable environmental planning and policy.

Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science
DePaul University (US), North Carolina State University (US), Arizona State University (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.