Naming the Pain in machine learning-enabled systems engineering

Machine learning (ML)-enabled systems are being increasingly adopted by companies aiming to enhance their products and operational processes. This paper aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of the current status quo of engineering ML-enabled systems and lay the foundation to steer practically relevant and problem-driven academic research. We conducted an international survey to collect insights from practitioners on the current practices and problems in engineering ML-enabled systems. We received 188 complete responses from 25 countries. We conducted quantitative statistical analyses on contemporary practices using bootstrapping with confidence intervals and qualitative analyses on the reported problems using open and axial coding procedures. Our survey results reinforce and extend existing empirical evidence on engineering ML-enabled systems, providing additional insights into typical ML-enabled systems project contexts, the perceived relevance and complexity of ML life cycle phases, and current practices related to problem understanding, model deployment, and model monitoring. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis provides a detailed map of the problems practitioners face within each ML life cycle phase and the problems causing overall project failure. The results contribute to a better understanding of the status quo and problems in practical environments. We advocate for the further adaptation and dissemination of software engineering practices to enhance the engineering of ML-enabled systems. • International survey gathering insights from 188 practitioners across 25 countries. • Overview of current practices and challenges in engineering ML-enabled systems. • Inferential quantitative analysis reporting the status quo with confidence intervals. • Qualitative analysis mapping ML life cycle challenges and causes of project failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2025-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107866
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Naming the Pain in machine learning-enabled systems engineering

Hélio Lopes, Hugo Villamizar, Niklas Lavesson, María Teresa Baldassarre et al.
3 citations
Information and Software Technology
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.85
article

Naming the Pain in machine learning-enabled systems engineering

Hélio Lopes, Hugo Villamizar, Niklas Lavesson, María Teresa Baldassarre, Stefan Wagner, Tony Gorschek, Michael Felderer, Görkem Giray, Daniel Méndez, Marcos Kalinowski, Tatiana Escovedo, Stefan Biffl, Antônio Pedro Santos Alves, Juergen Musil, Kelly Azevedo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML)-enabled systems are being increasingly adopted by companies aiming to enhance their products and operational processes. This paper aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of the current status quo of engineering ML-enabled systems and lay the foundation to steer practically relevant and problem-driven academic research. We conducted an international survey to collect insights from practitioners on the current practices and problems in engineering ML-enabled systems. We received 188 complete responses from 25 countries. We conducted quantitative statistical analyses on contemporary practices using bootstrapping with confidence intervals and qualitative analyses on the reported problems using open and axial coding procedures. Our survey results reinforce and extend existing empirical evidence on engineering ML-enabled systems, providing additional insights into typical ML-enabled systems project contexts, the perceived relevance and complexity of ML life cycle phases, and current practices related to problem understanding, model deployment, and model monitoring. Furthermore, the qualitative analysis provides a detailed map of the problems practitioners face within each ML life cycle phase and the problems causing overall project failure. The results contribute to a better understanding of the status quo and problems in practical environments. We advocate for the further adaptation and dissemination of software engineering practices to enhance the engineering of ML-enabled systems. • International survey gathering insights from 188 practitioners across 25 countries. • Overview of current practices and challenges in engineering ML-enabled systems. • Inferential quantitative analysis reporting the status quo with confidence intervals. • Qualitative analysis mapping ML life cycle challenges and causes of project failure.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 187
TU Wien (AT), University of Cologne (DE), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Fortiss (DE), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Technical University of Munich (DE)
European Commission, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
6.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.