Road network connectivity explains wildfire probability in Southern Italy

• Road network connectivity indices was analyzed across wildfire probability categories. • High wildfire probability areas exhibited higher road density, node, and link counts. • Alpha, Gamma, and Eta indices revealed strong topological differences among wildfire risk zones. • Integration of network topology into wildfire risk assessments and planning frameworks. Wildfire ignition and spread are strongly influenced by anthropogenic factors, particularly road networks. This study investigated the relationship between road network connectivity and wildfire probability in the Apulia region of southern Italy. A wildfire probability map was developed using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, incorporating wildfire occurrence data from 2000 to 2021, along with landscape, climatic, and topographic variables. The resulting probability map was classified into three categories: High Wildfire Probability (HWP), Medium Wildfire Probability (MWP), and Low Wildfire Probability (LWP). Cochran’s formula was used to calculate the required sample size, and Neyman allocation was applied to ensure optimal stratified sampling across probability categories. Connectivity indices were then estimated for each sampled area and statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results indicated that the majority of the study area fell within the LWP category (65.69 %), followed by MWP (21.48 %) and HWP (12.83 %). Statistically significant differences were observed across all categories for key connectivity indices. HWP areas exhibited higher road density, node counts, and number of links, reflecting more complex and interconnected road networks. In contrast, LWP areas showed lower connectivity and simpler network structures. The Alpha, Gamma, and Eta indices in particular displayed marked variation, with HWP zones exhibiting significantly higher values. These findings highlight the dual role of road networks: while they are vital for wildfire suppression and evacuation, their increased presence and complexity may elevate ignition risk due to greater human activity in densely connected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Road network connectivity explains wildfire probability in Southern Italy

Vincenzo Giannico, Mohsen Mostafa, Mario Elia, Giovanni Sanesi et al.
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
article

Road network connectivity explains wildfire probability in Southern Italy

Vincenzo Giannico, Mohsen Mostafa, Mario Elia, Giovanni Sanesi, Raffaele Lafortezza, Fantina Tedim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Road network connectivity indices was analyzed across wildfire probability categories. • High wildfire probability areas exhibited higher road density, node, and link counts. • Alpha, Gamma, and Eta indices revealed strong topological differences among wildfire risk zones. • Integration of network topology into wildfire risk assessments and planning frameworks. Wildfire ignition and spread are strongly influenced by anthropogenic factors, particularly road networks. This study investigated the relationship between road network connectivity and wildfire probability in the Apulia region of southern Italy. A wildfire probability map was developed using an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model, incorporating wildfire occurrence data from 2000 to 2021, along with landscape, climatic, and topographic variables. The resulting probability map was classified into three categories: High Wildfire Probability (HWP), Medium Wildfire Probability (MWP), and Low Wildfire Probability (LWP). Cochran’s formula was used to calculate the required sample size, and Neyman allocation was applied to ensure optimal stratified sampling across probability categories. Connectivity indices were then estimated for each sampled area and statistically analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results indicated that the majority of the study area fell within the LWP category (65.69 %), followed by MWP (21.48 %) and HWP (12.83 %). Statistically significant differences were observed across all categories for key connectivity indices. HWP areas exhibited higher road density, node counts, and number of links, reflecting more complex and interconnected road networks. In contrast, LWP areas showed lower connectivity and simpler network structures. The Alpha, Gamma, and Eta indices in particular displayed marked variation, with HWP zones exhibiting significantly higher values. These findings highlight the dual role of road networks: while they are vital for wildfire suppression and evacuation, their increased presence and complexity may elevate ignition risk due to greater human activity in densely connected areas.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 178
Centro de Estudos em Geografia e Ordenamento do Territorio (PT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Fire effects on ecosystems
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.