Toward Energy Justice Principles for Sustainable Lithium‐Ion Battery Technologies

Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) are indispensable for global decarbonization, yet their production and use have multifaceted environmental, social, and supply chain impacts. This study presents a holistic sustainability assessment of LIBs, integrating prefeasibility life cycle assessment and distributional energy justice principles. The research highlights significant disparities in environmental and social outcomes by examining five case studies, each reflecting different cathode chemistries and transport applications. While essential, carbon emissions represent only a fraction of the sustainability profile. Lithium iron phosphate cells cause the least environmental and social harm, whereas nickel‐ and cobalt‐rich chemistries elevate toxicity and criticality concerns. The analysis underscores the necessity for collaboration between economic regions, enhanced recycling systems, and broader adoption of energy justice frameworks. This work advocates for comprehensive, inclusive decision‐making approaches to foster equitable, sustainable battery technologies in the transition to net‐zero energy systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Published
2025-08-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aesr.202500042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Energy Justice Principles for Sustainable Lithium‐Ion Battery Technologies

Isabella D. R. Stephens, Emma Kendrick, Jordan J. Lindsay, Peter R. Slater et al.
1 citations
Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
article

Toward Energy Justice Principles for Sustainable Lithium‐Ion Battery Technologies

Isabella D. R. Stephens, Emma Kendrick, Jordan J. Lindsay, Peter R. Slater, Robert Pell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) are indispensable for global decarbonization, yet their production and use have multifaceted environmental, social, and supply chain impacts. This study presents a holistic sustainability assessment of LIBs, integrating prefeasibility life cycle assessment and distributional energy justice principles. The research highlights significant disparities in environmental and social outcomes by examining five case studies, each reflecting different cathode chemistries and transport applications. While essential, carbon emissions represent only a fraction of the sustainability profile. Lithium iron phosphate cells cause the least environmental and social harm, whereas nickel‐ and cobalt‐rich chemistries elevate toxicity and criticality concerns. The analysis underscores the necessity for collaboration between economic regions, enhanced recycling systems, and broader adoption of energy justice frameworks. This work advocates for comprehensive, inclusive decision‐making approaches to foster equitable, sustainable battery technologies in the transition to net‐zero energy systems.

Advanced Energy and Sustainability ResearchVol. 6(12)
China Nonferrous Metal Mining (China) (CN), The Faraday Institution (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.