Understanding end-user preferences for hand hygiene enabling technologies: A mixed-methods study in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia

Handwashing facilities (HWFs) are associated with higher rates of handwashing with soap, and the presence of a HWF is the global proxy indicator of household handwashing behaviour. There is limited information on HWF attributes important to end-users with few comparative assessments of HWFs from a user-perspective. We aimed to identify HWF attributes important to end-users and determine how pre-manufactured HWFs ranked by these attributes. This two-phased study was conducted with a diverse group of targeted end-users in two peri-urban communities in Lusaka, Zambia. We identified eight pre-existing HWFs: two manufactured locally (Kalingalinga bucket and Tippy tap) and six industrially produced, imported designs (Jengu, SatoTap, SaniTap, HappyTap, SpaTap, and Kohler Cleanse). In the first phase, focus group discussions explored what participants liked and disliked about each HWF, and thematic analysis defined nine attributes for comparison. In the second phase, participants individually ranked each HWF by these attributes, their overall preference, and their preference once estimated retail prices were revealed. Participants also ranked attributes by importance. Ranking data were modelled using rank-ordered logistic regression. Discussions revealed nine attributes important to end-users: appearance, water management, hygienic use, convenience, water disposal, vulnerability to theft or breakage, ease of use, price and maintenance. Hygienic use and water management were considered most important attributes. Excluding price, facilities resembling a sink, such as the Happy Tap (34%) and Jengu (28%), had the highest probability of being ranked first. With consideration for price, participants preferred lower-cost HWFs such as the Kalingalinga bucket (44%), Tippy Tap (13%) and SATO Tap (10%). This study identified nine attributes important to end-users that can inform future design efforts. Future work will explore user preferences in situ by rotating households through specific HWFs for an extended period. Potential manufacturers should continue to iterate on HWF designs emphasizing reducing costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Water
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000410
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding end-user preferences for hand hygiene enabling technologies: A mixed-methods study in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia

Katayi Mwila-Kazimbaya, Jenala Chipungu, Robert Dreibelbis, Mwamba Mwenge et al.
2 citations
PLOS Water
Child Nutrition and Water Access
2.24
article

Understanding end-user preferences for hand hygiene enabling technologies: A mixed-methods study in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia

Katayi Mwila-Kazimbaya, Jenala Chipungu, Robert Dreibelbis, Mwamba Mwenge, Katherine Davies, Elisabeth Tadiri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Handwashing facilities (HWFs) are associated with higher rates of handwashing with soap, and the presence of a HWF is the global proxy indicator of household handwashing behaviour. There is limited information on HWF attributes important to end-users with few comparative assessments of HWFs from a user-perspective. We aimed to identify HWF attributes important to end-users and determine how pre-manufactured HWFs ranked by these attributes. This two-phased study was conducted with a diverse group of targeted end-users in two peri-urban communities in Lusaka, Zambia. We identified eight pre-existing HWFs: two manufactured locally (Kalingalinga bucket and Tippy tap) and six industrially produced, imported designs (Jengu, SatoTap, SaniTap, HappyTap, SpaTap, and Kohler Cleanse). In the first phase, focus group discussions explored what participants liked and disliked about each HWF, and thematic analysis defined nine attributes for comparison. In the second phase, participants individually ranked each HWF by these attributes, their overall preference, and their preference once estimated retail prices were revealed. Participants also ranked attributes by importance. Ranking data were modelled using rank-ordered logistic regression. Discussions revealed nine attributes important to end-users: appearance, water management, hygienic use, convenience, water disposal, vulnerability to theft or breakage, ease of use, price and maintenance. Hygienic use and water management were considered most important attributes. Excluding price, facilities resembling a sink, such as the Happy Tap (34%) and Jengu (28%), had the highest probability of being ranked first. With consideration for price, participants preferred lower-cost HWFs such as the Kalingalinga bucket (44%), Tippy Tap (13%) and SATO Tap (10%). This study identified nine attributes important to end-users that can inform future design efforts. Future work will explore user preferences in situ by rotating households through specific HWFs for an extended period. Potential manufacturers should continue to iterate on HWF designs emphasizing reducing costs.

PLOS WaterVol. 4(8)
Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
2.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.