Solvation Free Energies of Anions: From Curated Reference Data to Predictive Models

Predicting the physicochemical properties of ionizable solutes, including solubility and lipophilicity, is of broad significance. Such predictions rely on the accurate determination of solvation free energies for ions. However, the limited availability of high-quality reference data poses a challenge in developing accurate, inexpensive computational prediction methods. In this study, we address both issues of data quality and availability. We present three databases and models related to ionic phenomena: (1) 8,241 p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data points across 8 solvents, (2) 5,536 gas-phase acidities from DLPNO-CCSD(T) QM calculations, and (3) 6,090 solvation free energies of anions across 8 solvents obtained from a thermodynamic cycle. We also report 6,088 solvation free energies of neutral conjugate solutes computed using the COSMO-RS method. The p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data were obtained from the iBonD database, cleaned, and combined with a separate compilation of trustworthy reference p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data. Gas-phase acidities were computed for most of the acids present in the p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> corpus. Leveraging these data, we compiled values for solvation free energies of anions. We then trained several graph neural network models, which can be used as an alternative to QM approaches to quickly estimate these properties. The p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> and gas-phase acidity models accept reaction SMILES strings of the acid dissociation as inputs, whereas the solvation energy model accepts the SMILES string of the anion. Our microscopic p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> model achieves good accuracy, with an overall test mean average error of 0.58 units on unseen solutes and 0.59 on the SAMPL7 challenge (the lowest error so far among multisolvent models). Our gas-phase acidity model had mean absolute errors slightly above 2 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> when evaluated against experimental data. The anionic solvation free energy model had mean absolute errors of less than 3 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> in several test evaluations, comparable to (though less reliable than) several widely used QM-based solvation models. The models and data are free and publicly available at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13987781.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c02578
Citations
2
Primary Topic
History and advancements in chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solvation Free Energies of Anions: From Curated Reference Data to Predictive Models

Irina V. Smirnova, Sofja Tshepelevitsh, Kai Leonhard, William H. Green et al.
2 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
History and advancements in chemistry
3.51
article

Solvation Free Energies of Anions: From Curated Reference Data to Predictive Models

Irina V. Smirnova, Sofja Tshepelevitsh, Kai Leonhard, William H. Green, Thomas Nevolianis, Jonathan W. Zheng, Ivari Kaljurand, Ivo Leito, Simon Müller, Matthias Baumann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Predicting the physicochemical properties of ionizable solutes, including solubility and lipophilicity, is of broad significance. Such predictions rely on the accurate determination of solvation free energies for ions. However, the limited availability of high-quality reference data poses a challenge in developing accurate, inexpensive computational prediction methods. In this study, we address both issues of data quality and availability. We present three databases and models related to ionic phenomena: (1) 8,241 p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data points across 8 solvents, (2) 5,536 gas-phase acidities from DLPNO-CCSD(T) QM calculations, and (3) 6,090 solvation free energies of anions across 8 solvents obtained from a thermodynamic cycle. We also report 6,088 solvation free energies of neutral conjugate solutes computed using the COSMO-RS method. The p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data were obtained from the iBonD database, cleaned, and combined with a separate compilation of trustworthy reference p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> data. Gas-phase acidities were computed for most of the acids present in the p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> corpus. Leveraging these data, we compiled values for solvation free energies of anions. We then trained several graph neural network models, which can be used as an alternative to QM approaches to quickly estimate these properties. The p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> and gas-phase acidity models accept reaction SMILES strings of the acid dissociation as inputs, whereas the solvation energy model accepts the SMILES string of the anion. Our microscopic p<i>K</i><sub>a</sub> model achieves good accuracy, with an overall test mean average error of 0.58 units on unseen solutes and 0.59 on the SAMPL7 challenge (the lowest error so far among multisolvent models). Our gas-phase acidity model had mean absolute errors slightly above 2 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> when evaluated against experimental data. The anionic solvation free energy model had mean absolute errors of less than 3 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> in several test evaluations, comparable to (though less reliable than) several widely used QM-based solvation models. The models and data are free and publicly available at doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13987781.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 147(34)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Tartu (EE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Hamburg University of Technology (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
History and advancements in chemistry
3.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.