Perceived accuracy and utilisation of DHIS2 data for health decision making and advocacy in Kenya: A Qualitative Study

Reliable health information systems (HIS) are critical for effective decision-making in the delivery of Primary Health Care and Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Nutrition (PHC/RMNCAH+N) services. In Kenya, the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) platform serves as the primary HIS for tracking health indicators. This qualitative study explored perceptions of DHIS2 data accuracy and use for decision-making among PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders across 15 counties in Kenya. 89 Key Informant Interviews were conducted with PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders, to explore experiences, barriers, and facilitators of DHIS2 data use. Thematic network analysis was employed to identify recurrent themes and generate insights into the utility of DHIS2-generated information. Sociotechnical challenges included limited technical capacity among health staff, inadequate analytical skills, and reliance on a small pool of Health Records Information Officers (HRIOs). However, positive practices emerged, such as the use of DHIS2 dashboards and user-friendly outputs, which were valued for supporting evidence-based decision-making and advocacy, particularly at higher levels of health management. In some counties, visual displays of data, including scorecards and performance trends, facilitated budget advocacy and community engagement. Contextual challenges and constraints, such as use of inconsistent data collection tools across counties post-devolution, human resource shortages, and limited integration of private sector data, contributed to incomplete reporting. These challenges underpinned perceived inaccuracy of DHIS2 data, arguably, hindering the complete reliance on DHIS2 data for planning and decision making. The study highlights the need for targeted investments to improve DHIS2 data accuracy and use through stronger stakeholder coordination, enhanced data synthesis skills, and fostering a culture of data ownership among a wide range of stakeholders in health, including political actors.. Addressing these gaps will contribute to improvement in DHIS2 data quality, enhanced ownership and reliance on DHIS2 data by PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders for decision making in Kenya.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004508
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived accuracy and utilisation of DHIS2 data for health decision making and advocacy in Kenya: A Qualitative Study

Conrad Wanyama, Fred Were, Doris Kinuthia, Jalemba Aluvaala et al.
2 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
5.63
article

Perceived accuracy and utilisation of DHIS2 data for health decision making and advocacy in Kenya: A Qualitative Study

Conrad Wanyama, Fred Were, Doris Kinuthia, Jalemba Aluvaala, Allan Govoga, Linet Kerubo, Patrick Amoth, Phoene Mesa Oware, Dan Odallo, Jalal Karimi, Michuki Maina, Andrew Mulwa, Ambrose Agweyu, Lawrence Okong’o, Peter Ngwatu, Gregory Omondi, David Githanga, Irene Amadi, Grace Rukwaro, Cynthia Amisi, Ali Kahtra, Celestine Adipo, Mohamed Adow, Nelly Bosire
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Reliable health information systems (HIS) are critical for effective decision-making in the delivery of Primary Health Care and Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Nutrition (PHC/RMNCAH+N) services. In Kenya, the District Health Information Software 2 (DHIS2) platform serves as the primary HIS for tracking health indicators. This qualitative study explored perceptions of DHIS2 data accuracy and use for decision-making among PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders across 15 counties in Kenya. 89 Key Informant Interviews were conducted with PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders, to explore experiences, barriers, and facilitators of DHIS2 data use. Thematic network analysis was employed to identify recurrent themes and generate insights into the utility of DHIS2-generated information. Sociotechnical challenges included limited technical capacity among health staff, inadequate analytical skills, and reliance on a small pool of Health Records Information Officers (HRIOs). However, positive practices emerged, such as the use of DHIS2 dashboards and user-friendly outputs, which were valued for supporting evidence-based decision-making and advocacy, particularly at higher levels of health management. In some counties, visual displays of data, including scorecards and performance trends, facilitated budget advocacy and community engagement. Contextual challenges and constraints, such as use of inconsistent data collection tools across counties post-devolution, human resource shortages, and limited integration of private sector data, contributed to incomplete reporting. These challenges underpinned perceived inaccuracy of DHIS2 data, arguably, hindering the complete reliance on DHIS2 data for planning and decision making. The study highlights the need for targeted investments to improve DHIS2 data accuracy and use through stronger stakeholder coordination, enhanced data synthesis skills, and fostering a culture of data ownership among a wide range of stakeholders in health, including political actors.. Addressing these gaps will contribute to improvement in DHIS2 data quality, enhanced ownership and reliance on DHIS2 data by PHC/RMNCAH+N stakeholders for decision making in Kenya.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(8)
University of Nairobi (KE), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Media Council of Kenya (KE), Ministry of Health (KE), Kenya Psychiatry Association​ (KE), University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.