Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies

Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) - two diterpenoids from plant Anisomeles malabarica. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary in vivo PK analyses. In vitro experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2025-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107235
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies

Navid Delshad, John Eriksson, Senthil Kumar Rajendran, Preethy Paul et al.
1 citations
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
1.05
article

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity of anisomelic acid and ovatodiolide: Guiding route of administration in preclinical studies

Navid Delshad, John Eriksson, Senthil Kumar Rajendran, Preethy Paul, Mikko Voipio, Emrah Yatkin, Michael Santos Silva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite extensive progress in cancer therapeutic research, translating promising anticancer compounds into clinical treatments often fails due to suboptimal pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. These shortcomings underscore the critical need for comprehensive pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in the early stages of drug development. Among the compounds that have shown promising anticancer effects in multiple preclinical studies are anisomelic acid (AA) and ovatodiolide (OVT) - two diterpenoids from plant Anisomeles malabarica. However, their pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile remain poorly characterized. To explore their potential as chemotherapy agents, we first evaluated their key in vitro pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, followed by an acute oral toxicity assessment and complementary in vivo PK analyses. In vitro experiments showed that both AA and OVT exhibited near-complete solubility in phosphate buffer, high stability, and strong permeability across MDR1-MDCK cell monolayer, and were not substrates of multidrug resistance protein (MDR1). However, OVT underwent rapid metabolism in liver microsomes in the presence of NADPH, whereas AA showed comparatively greater stability under the same conditions. Subsequent in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in mice also demonstrated rapid clearance and low systemic bioavailability for both compounds following intravenous (IV) or transdermal (TD) administration. Metabolite identification revealed extensive conjugation to cysteine, and no acute toxicity or mortality was observed at high oral doses. Collectively, these data underscore the distinct metabolic and clearance patterns that limit systemic bioavailability but highlight the favorable safety of AA and OVT. Moreover, while topical administration may offer therapeutic advantages for localized conditions, additional formulation strategies will be crucial to overcome limited bioavailability for systemic use of AA or OVT.

European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesVol. 213
Åbo Akademi University (FI), University of Turku (FI)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.